J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1989. 67:116-127.
© 1989 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McLaughlin, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Xie, J.-P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McLaughlin, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Xie, J.-P.

Responses of Beijing Black Hogs to Porcine Somatotropin

Carol L. McLaughlin1, Clifton A. Baile1, Shun-Zhang Qi2, Lian-Chun Wang2 and Jin-Pu Xie3

Monsanto Company, Chesterfield, MO, Beijing Agricultural University, Beijing, PRC and Northern Beijing State Farm, Beijing, PRC

Abstract

Somatotropin treatment of U.S-breed finishing hogs improves feed efficiency, growth rate and carcass lean-to-fat ratio. Because Chinese-bred hogs have poorer feed efficiency, growth rate and lean-to-fat ratio than U.S. bred hogs, the characteristics affected by porcine somatotropin (PST) may respond differently to treatment. In the present experiment, Beijing Black finishing hogs (a composite of a local Chinese, Berkshire and Yorkshire breeds) were treated with PST for 28 d from average initial to final weights of 67.8 to 96.6 kg. In hogs individually fed as much as they would eat four times a day (n = 12/treatment group, six gilts and six barrows), feed efficiency was improved by 22.4 and 29.9% by 2 and 4 mg/d PST, respectively (P < .01), primarily due to increased growth rate (22.1 and 32.6% greater than control, respectively, P < .01); feed intake was not affected. Performance of group-housed and group-fed hogs (six/pen, four pens/treatment) administered 2 mg/d PST for 28 d (average initial and final weights of 66.5 ± 1.7 and 94.0 ± 2.4 kg, respectively) was similar (22.7% improved feed efficiency, P < .01; 25% increased growth rate, P < .01). At slaughter, last rib backfat thickness was decreased an average of 19.2% for hogs treated with 2 and 4 mg/d PST (P < .01). Percentage of total muscle, obtained by physical separation of the half-carcass, was increased an average of 13.5% (P < .01), whereas percentage of total fat was decreased 21.8% (P < .01) in PST-treated hogs. The pH, water-holding capacity and meat color scores of longissimus muscle from PST-treated hogs did not differ from those of control hogs. Growth rate, feed efficiency and muscle weight responses to PST treatment were at least as large as those for U.S. breeds.


Footnotes

1 Monsanto Company, 700 Chesterfield Village Parkway, Chesterfield, MO 63198.

2 Depts. of Anim. Biochem. and Anim. Husb. Beijing Agric. Univ.

3 Northern Beijing State Farm, Beijing, PRC.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Society of Animal Science.