J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1988. 66:2239-2244.
© 1988 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, B.
Right arrow Articles by Haskins, F. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, B.
Right arrow Articles by Haskins, F. A.

Forage Quality and Performance of Yearlings Grazing Switchgrass Strains Selected for Differing Digestibility1

Bruce Anderson2, J. K. Ward3, K. P. Vogel4, M. G. Ward5, H. J. Gorz4 and F. A. Haskins2

University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583

Abstract

Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) is a native, perennial warm-season grass commonly used as summer pasture. Three strains of switchgrass with different in vitro DM disappearance (IVDMD) values were evaluated with yearling cattle (Bos taurus) in three replicated grazing trials All strains were similar in genetic background, maturity and yield potential. ‘Trailblazer’ (high-IVDMD) resulted in higher (P < .05) ADG than ‘Pathfinder’ and ‘low-IVDMD’. Available forage of Trailblazer had higher IVDMD than Pathfinder and low-IVDMD. The IVDMD differences among strains were similar throughout the season; IVDMD declined between .3 and .5 percentage units per day. Forage availability, CP, NDF and ADF, permanganate lignin and ash were similar among strains. This study documents that plant breeders can select switchgrass plants for higher IVDMD and that strains consisting of progeny of these plants can result in higher animal gains than strains consisting of progeny of unselected or low-IVDMD plants with similar genetic background, forage yield, maturity, morphology and chemical composition.


Footnotes

1 Journal paper no. 8443. Univ. of Nebraska Agric. Res. Div.

2 Dept. of Agron.

3 Dept. of Anim. Sci.

4 USDA-ARS.

5 Present address: Fort Keogh Livest. and Range Res. Sta., USDA, Miles City, MT 59301.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
M. A. Sanderson
Upland Switchgrass Yield, Nutritive Value, and Soil Carbon Changes Under Grazing and Clipping
Agron. J., May 7, 2008; 100(3): 510 - 516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
R. B. Mitchell, K. P. Vogel, T. J. Klopfenstein, B. E. Anderson, and R. A. Masters
Grazing Evaluation of Big Bluestems Bred for Improved Forage Yield and Digestibility
Crop Sci., September 23, 2005; 45(6): 2288 - 2292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
K. P. Vogel, A. A. Hopkins, K. J. Moore, K. D. Johnson, and I. T. Carlson
Winter Survival in Switchgrass Populations Bred for High IVDMD
Crop Sci., November 1, 2002; 42(6): 1857 - 1862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Society of Animal Science.