J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1988. 66:1592-1597.
© 1988 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coppock, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Greene, L. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Coppock, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Greene, L. W.

Addition of Salt to Cattle Diets Based on Sodium and Chloride in Feedstuffs and Drinking Water1,2,

C. E. Coppock, L. M. Windle, D. L. Wilks, C. G. Woelfel and L. W. Greene3

Texas A&M University, College Station 77843

Abstract

An array of feeds manufactured for cattle in Texas was analyzed for Na and Cl. These analyses revealed ranges of Na in the dry matter of dairy mixes from .34 to 1.90%, in creep grower feeds from .09 to 1.27% and in range cubes from .39 to 1.71%. Corresponding ranges for Cl were .42 to .80%, .43 to 1.33% and .67 to 2.48%, respectively. An analysis of 13 forages grown in Texas revealed large variations in Na (.02 to .96%) and Cl (.03 to 1.17%) dry basis. A summary of the composition of well water used for livestock in 20 counties of Texas also exhibited variation of 3 to 2,800 ppm Na and 2 to 5,000 ppm Cl. The means were sufficiently great that consideration of the amounts of these elements in forages and drinking water would reduce and, in many cases, eliminate the need for salt as a supplement for either element. Requirements for Na and Cl plus corresponding feedstuff composition values should be included in feed formulation programs, which then will include salt only when it is needed as a supplement for either element. This was illustrated using a least-cost linear program with drinking water included as a special feed.


Footnotes

1 Appreciation is expressed to H. D. Pennington of the Soils and Crops Sci. Dept. Texas A&M Univ. for the forage samples.

2 Tech. Article 22875 by the Texas Agric. Exp. Sta

3 Dept. of Anim. Sci.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Society of Animal Science.