J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1988. 66:1335-1339.
© 1988 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zinn, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Norman, B. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Zinn, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Norman, B. B.

Influence of Pelleting on the Comparative Feeding Value of Cottonseed Meal in Receiving Diets for Feedlot Calves

R. A. Zinn1, J. R. Dunbar2 and B. B. Norman3

University of California, El Centro 92243

Abstract

Three trials were conducted to evaluate the influence of pelleting solvent-extracted cottonseed meal on its comparative feeding value in receiving diets for feedlot calves. Treatments consisted of a basal diet supplemented with cottonseed meal in either a loose or pelleted (6.4-mm diameter) form. The basal diet contained (dry matter basis) 5.1% alfalfa hay, 17.3% sudangrass hay, 46.4% steam-flaked corn, 19.0% cottonseed meal, 5.8% cane molasses, 3.2% fat, 1.1% dicalcium phosphate, 1.3% limestone, .41% urea, .50% trace mineral salt and 2,200 IU/kg vitamin A. In two 56-d receiving trials involving 240 crossbred calves (100 kg), physical form of supplemental cottonseed meal did not influence feed intake or calf performance (P > .20). In a metabolism trial involving four crossbred calves (128 kg) with cannulas in the rumen and proximal duodenum, substituting pelleted cottonseed meal for the ground form did not influence ruminal or total tract digestibility of organic matter, acid detergent fiber or N (P > .20). Feeding value of cottonseed meal in receiving diets for feedlot calves was not improved through pelleting.


Footnotes

1 Anim. Sci. Dept.

2 Ext. Anim. Sci., Univ. of California, Davis 95616.

3 Ext. Vet. Med., Univ. of California, Davis 95616.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Society of Animal Science.