J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1988. 66:1275-1291.
© 1988 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reid, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Thayne, W. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reid, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Thayne, W. V.

Relationships between Nutritive Quality and Fiber Components of Cool Season and Warm Season Forages:A Retrospective Study1

R. L. Reid, G. A. Jung2 and W. V. Thayne

West Virginia University, Morgantown 26506

Abstract

Feeding trials were conducted with 428 forages in three forage classes (C3 grasses, legumes, C4 grasses) fed ad libitum to sheep and with 170 forages fed to cattle over a 20-yr period. Of this total, 153 forages were fed concurrently to sheep and cattle. Where the same forages were fed, mean dry matter digestibility (DMD) and dry matter intake (DMI) were lower (P < .01) for sheep than for cattle, with significant effects of forage class. With the main population of forages, the regression of DMI on DMD was positive and curvilinear (P < .01) for sheep, with no effect of forage class, and positive and linear (P < .0001) for cattle, with a significant effect of class. For all forages, correlations between DMI and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) concentration were –.57 for sheep and –.41 for cattle; regressions differed (P < .05) with class and animal species. Correlations of DMD with NDF and acid detergent fiber (ADF) concentrations were –.45 and –.59 (P < .01), respectively, for sheep, and –.32 and –.39 (P < .01) for cattle; again, regressions differed significantly with class and animal species. Within forage class, regressions of DMD and DMI on fiber components generally were linear. Intake of NDF (NDFI) was related to NDF percentage for all forages by a quadratic regression, with significant differences due to animal species and forage class. Results indicate that relationships between DMD, DMI and fiber fractions differ between forage classes and animal species, that C4 grasses are consumed at levels higher than would be expected from their DMD and fiber concentrations and that ruminants increase NDFI in response to higher NDF concentrations in the forage.


Footnotes

1 Scientific Paper No. 2082 of the West Virginia Agric. and For. Exp. Sta. The studies reported contributed to Northeastern Regional Res. Projects NE-24, NE-108 and NE-114.

2 USDA-ARS Regional Pasture Res. Lab., University Park, PA 16802.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
S. A. Bhatti, J. G. P. Bowman, J. L. Firkins, A. V. Grove, and C. W. Hunt
Effect of intake level and alfalfa substitution for grass hay on ruminal kinetics of fiber digestion and particle passage in beef cattle
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2008; 86(1): 134 - 145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
V. R. Mulkey, V. N. Owens, and D. K. Lee
Management of Switchgrass-Dominated Conservation Reserve Program Lands for Biomass Production in South Dakota
Crop Sci., February 1, 2006; 46(2): 712 - 720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Society of Animal Science.