J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1988. 66:1256-1266.
© 1988 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, M. L.

Factors Affecting the Particle Size Distribution of Grazed Forage due to Ingestive Mastication by Steers and Wethers1

M. L. Nelson2

Washington State University, Pullman 99164-6320

Abstract

Two grazing trials with four crossbred steers (Trial 1, 326 kg; Trial 2, 267 kg) and one trial with four crossbred wethers (31 kg) were conducted to determine the variability between animals in and to identify chemical composition correlated with the particle size distributions of esophageal masticate. Steers in Trial 1 and wethers in Trial 3 differed (P < .05) in log10 standard deviation of particle size distributions. The proportion of medium particles (495 to 991 µm) increased linearly (P < .05), and the proportion of large particles (> 991 µm) decreased linearly (P < .1) across periods in Trial 1. Log10 mean particle size in Trials 2 and 3 and log10 standard deviation in Trials 1 and 2 were positively correlated (P < .1) with in vitro organic matter disappearance of esophageal masticate. Log10 standard deviation was negatively correlated (P < .1) with neutral detergent fiber content of esophageal masticate in Trials 1 and 3, acid detergent fiber content (P < .1) in Trial 1 and acid detergent lignin content (P < .1) in Trials 1 and 2. The results are interpreted to indicate that composition or maturity of forage consumed altered ingestive mastication. However, individual animals also differed in ingestive mastication across periods, which resulted in an animal x period interaction in one trial.


Footnotes

1 Scientific paper no. 7741, College of Agric. and Home Econ. Res. Center, Washington State Univ. Research conducted under Project No. 0713. Technical assistance of J. W. Finley, C. T. Gaskins, L. Motjope and S. M. Parish is gratefully acknowledged.

2 Dept. of Anim. Sci.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
M. L. Nelson, J. R. Busboom, C. F. Ross, and J. V. O'Fallon
Effects of supplemental fat on growth performance and quality of beef from steers fed corn finishing diets
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2008; 86(4): 936 - 948.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
M. L. Nelson, D. J. Marks, J. R. Busboom, J. D. Cronrath, and L. Falen
Effects of supplemental fat on growth performance and quality of beef from steers fed barley-potato product finishing diets: I. Feedlot performance, carcass traits, appearance, water binding, retail storage, and palatability attributes
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2004; 82(12): 3600 - 3610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. C. Burns and L. E. Sollenberger
Grazing Behavior of Ruminants and Daily Performance from Warm-Season Grasses
Crop Sci., May 1, 2002; 42(3): 873 - 881.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Society of Animal Science.