J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1988. 66:3153-3159.
© 1988 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Selk, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Garmendia, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Selk, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Garmendia, J. C.

Relationships among Weight Change, Body Condition and Reproductive Performance of Range Beef Cows1

G. E. Selk2, R. P. Wettemann2, K. S. Lusby2, J. W. Oltjen2, S. L. Mobley3, R. J. Rasby4 and J. C. Garmendia5

Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station, Stillwater 74078-0425

Abstract

A 5-yr study involving 45 to 78 pregnant Hereford range cows each year evaluated relationships among prepartum nutrition, body condition scores, BW changes and reproduc- tive performance. Four prepartum nutritional treatments were imposed. One group of cows were fed to maintain (M) their November BW until calving in March and April. The other three groups of cows were fed to lose about 5% of their November BW by 8 wk before parturition, then to maintain BW (LM), lose an additional 5% of their BW (LL) or gain 5% of their BW (LG). After calving, all cows were fed to maintain BW. Body condition scores and BW were recorded every 14 d throughout the trial. Linear regression analyses were conducted to examine treatment effects on BW, body condition score and measures of reproductive performance. A discriminant analysis was performed on pregnancy rate and percentage of cows with ovarian luteal activity by 85 d after parturition. The M cows had a greater pregnancy rate (71%) than cows on other treatment groups. The LL cows had a reduced pregnancy rate (42%) compared with LM (51%) and LG (58%) cows. Prepartum nutritional treatment did not affect the days from parturition to conception. Precalving body condition score and November to January BW changes influenced pregnancy rate (P < .001). A cubic response curve described the relationship between pregnancy rate and precalving body condition score for cows with condition scores of 3 through 7. The decrease in body condition score from November to January was correlated (r = –.25, P < .01) with days to conception. Body condition scores precalving and at the start of the breeding season, along with BW changes between 2 and 4 mo before parturition, are major factors that influence pregnancy rate of range beef cows.


Footnotes

1 Journal Article No. 5398 of the Agric. Exp. Sta., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater.

2 Anim. Sci. Dept., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater 74078-0425.

3 Present Address: Route 1, Franklinton, NC 27525.

4 Present Address: Anim. Sci. Dept., Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln 68503.

5 Present Address: Faculty of Vet. Sci., Universidad Central de Venezuela, Maracay.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. Flores, M. L. Looper, R. W. Rorie, M. A. Lamb, S. T. Reiter, D. M. Hallford, D. L. Kreider, and C. F. Rosenkrans Jr.
Influence of body condition and bovine somatotropin on estrous behavior, reproductive performance, and concentrations of serum somatotropin and plasma fatty acids in postpartum Brahman-influenced cows
J Anim Sci, May 1, 2007; 85(5): 1318 - 1329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
W. K. Coblentz, K. P. Coffey, T. F. Smith, D. S. Hubbell III, D. A. Scarbrough, J. B. Humphry, B. C. McGinley, J. E. Turner, J. A. Jennings, C. P. West, et al.
Using Orchardgrass and Endophyte-Free Fescue Versus Endophyte-Infected Fescue Overseeded on Bermudagrass for Cow Herds: II. Four-Year Summary of Cow-Calf Performance
Crop Sci., July 25, 2006; 46(5): 1929 - 1938.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
H. C. Freetly, C. L. Ferrell, and T. G. Jenkins
Nutritionally altering weight gain patterns of pregnant heifers and young cows changes the time that feed resources are offered without any differences in production
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2005; 83(4): 916 - 926.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
T. M. Prado, R. P. Wettemann, L. J. Spicer, J. A. Vizcarra, and G. L. Morgan
Influence of exogenous gonadotropin-releasing hormone on ovarian function in beef cows after short- and long-term nutritionally induced anovulation
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2002; 80(12): 3268 - 3276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
L. R. Gentry, D. L. Thompson Jr., G. T. Gentry Jr., K. A. Davis, and R. A. Godke
High versus low body condition in mares: Interactions with responses to somatotropin, GnRH analog, and dexamethasone
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2002; 80(12): 3277 - 3285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
L. R. Gentry, D. L. Thompson Jr., G. T. Gentry Jr., K. A. Davis, R. A. Godke, and J. A. Cartmill
The relationship between body condition, leptin, and reproductive and hormonal characteristics of mares during the seasonal anovulatory period
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2002; 80(10): 2695 - 2703.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Society of Animal Science.