J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1988. 66:2865-2875.
© 1988 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verstegen, M. W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Curtis, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Verstegen, M. W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Curtis, S. E.

Energetics of Sows and Gilts in Gestation Crates in the Cold

Martin W. A. Verstegen1,2, and Stanley E. Curtis1,3,

University of Illinois, Urbana 61801

Abstract

Seventy pregnant sows and gilts in gestation crates with unbedded concrete-slat floors and partitions in common (which permitted contact by neighbors) in a closed house with air temperature 10 to 12°C during cold weather were studied for 3 wk. The animals' lower critical temperature and thermoregulatory heat and feed requirements were estimated from measured variables, including ME intake, body weight and its change and body surface temperature, and other calculated values and assumptions. Estimates for a 165-kg sow or gilt in such an environment were: lower critical temperature = 15°C; thermoregulatory heat requirement = 126 to 161 kcal/d per 1 C° of coldness (higher as pregnancy progresses); and thermoregulatory feed requirement = 42 to 54 g/d per 1 C° of coldness (assuming 3 kcal ME/g of diet). The sow's lower critical temperature was affected by state of pregnancy; in late pregnancy it was 1.6 to 2.6 C° lower than in early pregnancy. These estimates of the pregnant sow's thermoregulatory heat and feed requirements at effective environmental temperatures below the lower critical temperature accord well with those published before. But this estimate of the pregnant sow's lower critical temperature is approximately 5 C° lower than several made in laboratory settings on animals held individually, with no opportunity to huddle. The fact that every sow and gilt in this experiment could make mechanical contact with at least one neighbor at all times, and sometimes two, might account for much of the difference in lower critical temperature estimates.


Footnotes

1 Anim. Sciences Dept. Address reprint requests to: 126 Anim. Sci. Lab., 1207 W. Gregory Dr., Urbana, IL 61801.

2 Miller Visiting Fellow. Permanent address: Anim. Nutr. Dept., Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

3 The advice of Daniel Gianola on statistical analysis is gratefully acknowledged.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. L. Salak-Johnson, S. R. Niekamp, S. L. Rodriguez-Zas, M. Ellis, and S. E. Curtis
Space allowance for dry, pregnant sows in pens: Body condition, skin lesions, and performance
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2007; 85(7): 1758 - 1769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Society of Animal Science.