J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1988. 66:2722-2727.
© 1988 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harvey, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Burns, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Harvey, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Burns, J. C.

Forage Species, Concentrate Feeding Level and Cow Management System in Combination with Early Weaning1

R. W. Harvey2 and J. C. Burns3

North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695-7621

Abstract

One hundred twenty-eight early weaned calves were used in a 3-yr study to evaluate four forage treatments and two concentrate feeding levels on midsummer calf performance. Forage treatments (four plots/forage) were 1) control-hill land pasture, 2) Tillman white clover (Trifolium repens L.), 3) a Tillman white clover and Kenhy tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) mixture and 4) pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum L. Leeke). Calves on each forage treatment were provided ground ear corn ad libitum or restricted to 1% of BW. Calf daily gains were .72, .82, .57 and .92 kg/d for control, clover, clover-fescue and millet, respectively. Calves grazing millet had the greatest response in gain and concentrate/gain (P < .05) compared with controls. Early weaned calves provided the clover-fescue mixture gained less (P < .05) than those grazing the control pasture. Average daily gains and concentrate intakes were higher (P < .05) for calves provided concentrate ad libitum compared with those fed restricted concentrate (.88 and 3.29 vs .64 and 1.43 kg/d). In a second study, 90 cows and 30 calves were used to evaluate pasture productivity from the following three cow management systems: 1) control-cows nursing calves, 2) dry cow maintenance—dams of early weaned calves stocked at a level to maintain BW and 3) dry cow gain-dams of early weaned calves stocked at a similar rate as controls and allowed to gain. Final weights, cow weight changes and cow gains of controls were similar to those on the dry cow maintenance treatment, but were less (P < .05) than those on the dry cow gain treatment. However, the 20.7-kg increase in gain of cows on the dry cow gain treatment over controls offers little potential for increasing efficiency of calf production.


Footnotes

1 Paper No. 11427 of the Journal Series of the North Carolina ARS, Raleigh 27695-7601. Use of trade names in this publication does not imply endorsement by the North Carolina ARS or criticism of similar products not mentioned.

2 Dept. of Anim. Sci.

3 Plant Physiologist, USDA, ARS and Dept. of Crop Sci.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. M. B. Vendramini, L. E. Sollenberger, J. C. B. Dubeux Jr., S. M. Interrante, R. L. Stewart Jr., and J. D. Arthington
Concentrate Supplementation Effects on the Performance of Early Weaned Calves Grazing Tifton 85 Bermudagrass
Agron. J., February 6, 2007; 99(2): 399 - 404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Society of Animal Science.