HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Solomon, M. B. Articles by Dunn, M. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Solomon, M. B. Articles by Dunn, M. C.

Simultaneous Histochemical Determination of Three Fiber Types in Single Sections of Ovine, Bovine and Porcine Skeletal Muscle

U.S. Department of Agriculture^1,2,, Beltsville, Maryland 20705

Abstract

Classification of muscle fiber types involves tedious comparisons of serial muscle tissue sections. Procedures that would incorporate pertinent histochemical properties into one simplified assay for the successful differentiation and determination of fiber types were evaluated using muscle samples from three different species (ovine, bovine and porcine). For ovine and porcine muscle tissue, the best staining procedure involved initial preincubation of the tissue section at 4.35 (for ovine) and 4.30 (for porcine) followed by incubating for succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) activity, then staining for myofibrillar adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase) activity after an acid preincubation and, finally, counterstaining with hematoxylin. For bovine muscle tissue, the procedure involves first incubating for SDH activity, after which the section is incubated at pH 4.15 and then stained for myofibrillar ATPase activity after an acid preincubation, with a concluding counterstaining using hematoxylin. These procedures permit successful differentiation and identification of three fiber types (ßR, R and W) from a single section of muscle tissue with approximately a 65% saving in time and materials. The results of histochemically typing muscle fibers in a single tissue section stained with these techniques were similar to those obtained with the traditional methods comparing serial sections.

¹ Meat Sci. Res. Lab., Anim. Sci. Inst., Agric. Res. Serv.

² Mention of specific equipment does not imply endorsement by the USDA.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Bee, M. Calderini, C. Biolley, G. Guex, W. Herzog, and M. D. Lindemann Changes in the histochemical properties and meat quality traits of porcine muscles during the growing-finishing period as affected by feed restriction, slaughter age, or slaughter weight J Anim Sci, April 1, 2007; 85(4): 1030 - 1045. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Hambrecht, J. J. Eissen, D. J. Newman, C. H. M. Smits, M. W. A. Verstegen, and L. A. den Hartog Preslaughter handling effects on pork quality and glycolytic potential in two muscles differing in fiber type composition J Anim Sci, April 1, 2005; 83(4): 900 - 907. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. G. Gentry, J. J. McGlone, J. R. Blanton Jr., and M. F. Miller Impact of spontaneous exercise on performance, meat quality, and muscle fiber characteristics of growing/finishing pigs J Anim Sci, November 1, 2002; 80(11): 2833 - 2839. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. S. Kirchofer, C. R. Calkins, and B. L. Gwartney Fiber-type composition of muscles of the beef chuck and round J Anim Sci, November 1, 2002; 80(11): 2872 - 2878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]