J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1988. 66:185-193.
© 1988 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Craig, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, B. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Craig, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, B. D.

Effects of Level, Form and Time of Urea Application on the Nutritive Value of Alicia Bermuda Grass1

W. M. Craig2, J. A. Ulloa2, K. L. Watkins2 and B. D. Nelson3

Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge 70803

Abstract

The effects of urea level (1.5% vs 3% Urea-NH3), form of urea application (crystalline vs 50% aqueous solution) and time of treatment (freshly cut vs before baling) on the nutritive value of mature Alicia Bermuda grass were determined using a completely randomized design with a 2 x 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments. Urea-treated forage (UTF) was compared with either untreated forage or forage treated with 1.5% or 3% anhydrous NH3. On day of baling (0 d), UTF had higher (P<.01) crude protein (CP) and in vitro organic matter digestibility (IVOMD) than did untreated forage. Forage treated with 3% Urea-NH3 had higher (P<.01) CP and IVOMD than did 1.5% Urea-NH3treated forage. Application of crystalline urea resulted in lower (P<.01) CP content of forage dry matter (DM) than did urea apphed as 50% solution. Form of application had no effect (P>.10) on IVOMD. Application of urea to freshly cut forage resulted in higher (P<.05) IVOMD than that of forage treated before baling. After 60 d of storage, untreated forage had higher (P<.01) DM, neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF) and hemicellulose, but had lower (P<.05) IVOMD, than respective 0-d forage. Urea-treated forage showed similar increases in fiber fractions compared with untreated forage; however, UTF showed a further increase (P<.01) in IVOMD after 60 d. Urea concentration in the UTF decreased (P<.01) after 60 d. Forage treated with 3% anhydrous NH3 or 3% crystalline urea at time of cutting showed similar (P>.05) IVOMD that was greater (P<.05) than that for all other treatments. Results of this study are interpreted to indicate that urea has potential as a treatment to improve the nutritive value of low-quality forages.


Footnotes

1 Approved for publication by the Director of the Louisiana Experiment Station as manuscript number 87-11-1186.

2 Dept. of Anim. Sci.

3 Southeastern Research Station, Franklinton, LA.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Society of Animal Science.