HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lambert, M. G. Articles by Jung, G. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lambert, M. G. Articles by Jung, G. A.

Effect of Hay Substitution on Intake and Digestibility of Forage Rape (Brassica napus) Fed to Lambs^1,2,

U. S. Regional Pasture Research Laboratory and The Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802

Abstract

Intake and digestibility trials were conducted with sheep to evaluate the effect of adding various levels of a typical fibrous grass forage (neutral detergent fiber, NDF=68%) to a high quality, low fiber (NDF=22%) brassica forage. Four forage rape:orchardgrass hay diets (0, 40, 70, 100% rape content on a dry matter basis) were fed to groups of six Polled-Dorset crossbred growing wether lambs (39.6 kg) individually housed in metabolism crates. After a 7-d ad libitum intake period, a 7-d digestibility trial was conducted at 90% of the observed ad libitum intake level. Digestible dry matter intake (DDMI) per unit metabolic body weight increased as rape in the diet was increased from 0 to 70%, with increases in both dry matter intake and dry matter digestibility (DMD). However, DDMI was similar for lambs fed the 70 and 100% rape diets, with DMI decreasing to the same relative extent as DMD increased. Digestibility of the cell wall fraction of the two intermediate diets (40% rape and 70% rape) was lower than predicted from component forage digestibilities. This observation suggests the existence of an associative effect similar to that often reported when forage and concentrates are fed in various ratios. Forage brassicas appear to be utilized in the ruminant in a manner more typically resembling a concentrate than a forage.

¹ Authorized for publication as paper no. 7579 in the Journal Series of the Pennsylvania Agric. Exp. Sta.

² The authors gratefully acknowledge the technical assistance of Maureen Lambert and Kathy Vorse. Dr. D. L. Gustine is acknowledged for conducting the SMCO and glucosinolate analyses.

³ Present address: Grasslands Division, DSIR, Private Bag, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

⁴ USDA, Agric. Res. Serv., U. S. Dairy Forage Res. Center (PA Cluster), U. S. Regional Pasture Res. Lab., University Park, PA 16802.

⁵ Dept. of Dairy and Anim. Sci.

⁶ To whom reprint requests should be addressed.

⁷ USDA, Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Regional Pasture Res. Lab., University Park, PA 16802.