J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1987. 65:1553-1562.
© 1987 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pfeiffer, F. A.
Right arrow Articles by Calhoun, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pfeiffer, F. A.
Right arrow Articles by Calhoun, M. C.

Effects of Environmental, Site and Phenological Factors on Hymenoxon Content of Bitterweed (Hymenoxys odorata)1,2,

F. A. Pfeiffer and M. C. Calhoun3,4,

Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, San Angelo 76901

Abstract

Bitterweed plants were collected biweekly from four ranches located on the Edwards Plateau of Texas. The area covered was approximately 220 km from north to south and 80 km wide. The study started in December when bitterweed plants were in the seedling stage and continued to the following June, when seed heads were present and most plants were desiccated. Environmental conditions and phenological stage of bitterweed populations were recorded and hymenoxon was determined. Hymenoxon, a sesquiterpene lactone with an exocyclic {alpha}-methylene-{gamma}-lactone moiety, is the principal toxic constituent in bitterweed. Hymenoxon concentrations were highest in seedlings and decreased as the plants matured. Levels ranged from 1.1 to 4.5% (dry matter basis) in bitterweed collected in December and from 0 to .8% in June collections. When sampled at approximately the same phenological stage, there were significant differences in hymenoxon content of bitterweed growing at different locations, which appeared to be unrelated to environmental conditions. Whether these differences are due to genetic differences in plant populations or to phenotypic differences is unknown.


Footnotes

1 Technical article no. 21922 from the Texas Agric. Exp. Sta., Texas A&M Univ. System, San Angelo, TX 76901. All programs and information of the Texas Agric. Exp. Sta. are available without regard to race, ethnic origin, religion, sex or age.

2 Supported in part by the Natural Fibers and Food Protein Commission of Texas.

3 Texas A&M University Agric. Res. Center, 7887 N. Highway 87, San Angelo, TX 76901.

4 Appreciation is expressed to Stanley Horwood, Bill Pfluger, Robert Oglesby and Dr. Leo Merrill for allowing access to their respective ranches. Appreciation is also expressed to Dr. H. L. Kim for providing pure hymenoxon and to Dr. B. J. Camp and Estelle Hejtmancik for assistance with hymenoxon assays.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American Society of Animal Science.