HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bourdon, R. M. Articles by Brinks, J. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bourdon, R. M. Articles by Brinks, J. S.

Simulated Efficiency of Range Beef Production. I. Growth and Milk Production¹

Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523

Abstract

A revised version of the Texas A&M University Beef Cattle Production Model was used to simulate the effects of growth, milk production and management system on biological and economic efficiency of beef production in a northern plains, range environment. Animals varying in genetic potential for birth weight (BWA), yearling weight (YW), mature weight (WMA) and milk production (PMA) were simulated under both a weanling system of management (weaned calves custom-fed in the feedlot) and a yearling system (calves wintered on the ranch, then custom-fed after their second summer). The yearling system of management was biologically less efficient, but economically more efficient than the weanling system due primarily to heavier slaughter weights of fed animals. The advantage of the yearling system was most apparent for smaller genotypes. Herd efficiency improved with decreased BWA and increased YW, but changed little when WMA was varied while other growth traits were held constant. Increased PMA was favored for production of live weight at weaning and for production of slaughter product when feedlot costs were high. Increased PMA was not favored when feed costs for the cow herd were high. Economic weights generated from the simulation indicated the importance of selection for rapid early growth followed by selection for lighter birth weight. While larger genotypes were generally favored in this study, optimal cow size depended on economic conditions. Larger types were more biologically efficient and more economically efficient using standard costs, but medium- and small-size cattle were more efficient when feedlot costs were high. Small cattle were least efficient when feed costs for the cow herd were high.

¹ Funding was provided by Colorado Agric. Exp. Sta. Project No. 1-5607 and the Institute for Computational Studies at Colorado State Univ.

² Assistant Professor and Professor, respectively, Dept. of Anim. Sci.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. R. Shafer, R. M. Bourdon, and R. M. Enns Simulation of cow-calf production with and without realistic levels of variability J Anim Sci, February 1, 2007; 85(2): 332 - 340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]