HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by McLaren, D. G. Articles by Williams, J. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by McLaren, D. G. Articles by Williams, J. E.

Economic Evaluation of Alternative Crossbreeding Systems Involving Four Breeds of Swine. II. System Efficiency¹

Oklahoma State University Stillwater 74078

Abstract

A static, deterministic computer model was used to calculate production efficiency (cost per kg of product) for four purebred and 69 alternative crossbreeding systems involving the Duroc, Yorkshire, Landrace and Spotted breeds of swine. Crossbreeding systems were defined as including all purebred, crossbred and commercial matings necessary to maintain a total of 10,000 farrowings. Driving variables for the model were predicted mean conception rates, litter size born, preweaning survival rate, postweaning average daily gain, feed-to-gain ratio and carcass backfat. Predictions were computed using breed effect and heterosis estimates obtained from experimental data involving the four breeds collected at the Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station between 1976 and 1979. The most efficient breed combinations for each of the nine types of crossbreeding systems evaluated were predicted to reduce cost per kg of product by 6.7 to 10.5%, relative to the most efficient purebred (Duroc). The Duroc x (Yorkshire, Landrace, Spotted) four-breed rotaterminal was predicted to be the most efficient system, followed by the Duroc x (Yorkshire, Landrace) rotaterminal. Duroc x (Spotted x Landrace) and Duroc x (Spotted x Yorkshire) static systems ranked third and fourth overall, respectively. Sensitivity analysis indicated that ranking of systems predicted to be most efficient under the default model was reasonably robust to varying input economic, genetic and management parameter values. Results of this study suggested that three- or four-breed rotaterminal or static systems should maximize effective use of heterosis and breed complementarity in swine production systems.

¹ Manuscript 5142 of the Oklahoma Agric. Exp. Sta., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater 74078.

² Present address: Anim. Sci. Dept., Univ. of Illinois, 126 Anim. Sci. Lab, 1207 W. Gregory Dr., Urbana, 61801.

³ Dept. of Anim. Sci.

⁴ Dept. of Agric. Econ.