HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by McLaren, D. G. Articles by Williams, J. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by McLaren, D. G. Articles by Williams, J. E.

Economic Evaluation of Alternative Crossbreeding Systems Involving Four Breeds of Swine. I. The Simulation Model¹

Oklahoma State University Stillwater 74078

Abstract

A static, deterministic computer model, programmed in Microsoft© Basic for IBM® PC and Apple® Macintosh^TM computers, was developed to calculate production efficiency (cost per kg of product) for nine alternative types of crossbreeding system involving four breeds of swine. The model simulates efficiencies for four purebred and 60 alternative two-, three- and four-breed rotation, rotaterminal, backcross and static cross systems. Crossbreeding systems were defined as including all purebred, crossbred and commercial matings necessary to maintain a total of 10,000 farrowings. Driving variables for the model are mean conception rate at first service and for an 8-wk breeding season, litter size born, preweaning survival rate, postweaning average daily gain, feed-to-gain ratio and carcass backfat. Predictions are computed using breed direct genetic and maternal effects for the four breeds, plus individual, maternal and paternal specific heterosis values, input by the user. Inputs required to calculate the number of females farrowing in each sub-system include the proportion of males and females replaced each breeding cycle in purebred and crossbred populations, the proportion of male and female offspring in seedstock herds that become breeding animals, and the number of females per boar. Inputs required to calculate the efficiency of terminal production (cost-to-product ratio) for each sub-system include breeding herd feed intake, gilt development costs, feed costs and labor and overhead costs. Crossbreeding system efficiency is calculated as the weighted average of sub-system cost-to-product ratio values, weighting by the number of females farrowing in each sub-system.

¹ Manuscript 5143 of the Oklahoma Agric. Exp. Sta., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater 74078. Copies of computer programs described in this manuscript can be obtained by sending a blank diskette and stamped, addressed return mailer to the first author.

² Present address: Anim. Sci. Dept., Univ. of Illinois, 126 Anim. Sci. Lab., 1207 W. Gregory Dr., Urbana 61801.

³ Dept. of Anim. Sci.

⁴ Dept. of Agric. Econ.