J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1987. 65:865-871.
© 1987 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andersen, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Horn, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Andersen, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Horn, G. W.

Effect of Lasalocid on Weight Gains, Ruminal Fermentation and Forage Intake of Stocker Cattle Grazing Winter Wheat Pasture1,2,

M. A. Andersen3 and G. W. Horn3

Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station, Stillwater 74078-0425

Abstract

Fifty fall-weaned heifers with initial weights of 209 kg (yr 1) and 222 kg (yr 2) were used to determine effects of lasalocid on weight gains, forage intake and ruminal fermentation of stocker cattle grazing winter wheat pasture. The heifers grazed a single wheat pasture for about 100 d each year, and were individually fed 1.06 kg of supplement (6 d/wk) pro-rated to supply 0, 100 or 200 mg lasalocid·head–1·d–1. Also, eight mature Hereford steers with large rumen cannula were used to evaluate further effects of lasalocid (0 or 300 mg) on ruminal fermentation during two grazing periods (immature and mature wheat forage) of yr 2 and an additional third year. Daily gains of heifers fed 200 mg lasalocid/d were .11 kg greater (P<.05) than those of heifers fed 0 or 100 mg lasalocid/d. One hundred milligrams lasalocid did not increase weight gains. Digestibilities of forage dry matter (DM) and organic matter (OM) were similar (P>.05) among treatments, and lasalocid did not affect (P>.10) forage intake. Ruminal ammonia concentrations (10.57, 15.22 and 17.81 mg/dl ± 1.71) were increased (P<.05) by both levels of lasalocid in yr 1, but differences among treatment means of 8.32, 11.95 and 11.66 (SE ± 1.44) were not significant in yr 2. Lasalocid did not consistently affect total volatile fatty acids concentrations. The acetic:propionic acid ratios in heifers were not different (P>.05) among treatments, but were decreased (P<.10) by lasalocid in cannulated steers. Results of these studies were interpreted as indicating that 200 mg lasalocid/d was effective in increasing weight gains of stocker cattle on wheat pasture without altering forage intake.


Footnotes

1 Journal article no. 5120 of the Agric. Exp. Sta., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater 74078.

2 The term "stocker cattle" as used in this manuscript refers to weaned beef cattle that are grown to higher weights on wheat pasture before being placed in feedlots.

3 Anim. Sci. Dept.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
W. A. Phillips and G. W. Horn
Intake and digestion of wheat forage by stocker calves and lambs
J Anim Sci, September 1, 2008; 86(9): 2424 - 2429.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American Society of Animal Science.