J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1987. 65:777-785.
© 1987 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jacques, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Higginbotham, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jacques, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Higginbotham, J. F.

Influence of Lasalocid Level on Forage Intake, Digestibility, Ruminal Fermentation, Liquid Flow and Performance of Beef Cattle Grazing Winter Range1,2,3,

K. A. Jacques4,, R. C. Cochran4,6,, L. R. Corah4, T. B. Avery7, K. O. Zoellner4 and J. F. Higginbotham8

Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506

Abstract

Three experiments were conducted to study the effects of lasalocid level on performance, intake, digestibility, ruminal fermentation and fluid flow of beef cattle grazing dormant, tallgrass prairie. In Exp. 1, 120 pregnant, mature beef cows of primarily Hereford breeding (avg wt = 471 kg) were randomly assigned to received 0, 100, 200 or 300 mg lasalocid·head–1 ·d–1 in 1.82 kg supplement. Weight changes at 30, 60 or 90 d, condition score change and calf birth weight were not affected (P>.10) by lasalocid level. In Exp. 2, estimates of intake and digestibility were obtained with 40 pregnant, mature Hereford cows (avg wt = 474 kg) and 12 esophageal-cannulated, Hereford x Angus steers (avg wt = 225 kg), using Yb and indigestible acid detergent fiber as markers for fecal output and digestibility, respectively. Levels of lasalocid provided to cows and steers were similar, on a body weight (BW) basis, to those in Exp. 1 and corresponded to approximately 0, .22, .44 or .66 mg lasalocid/kg BW. Total diet and forage organic matter digestibility for beef cows decreased (P<.01) at the .22 mg/kg BW level, but increased at the .44 and .66 mg/ kg BW levels. Organic matter intake was not influenced (P>.10) by lasalocid addition. In Exp. 3, 16 ruminal-cannulated, Hereford x Angus steers (avg wt = 227 kg) were given the same lasalocid dosages per kg BW as in Exp. 2, and were used to study the effects of lasalocid on ruminal fermentation and fluid flow characteristics. Lasalocid did not influence (P>.10) ruminal pH, ammonia N, total volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentrations, molar proportions of individual VFA or fluid flow measurements. In conclusion, providing lasalocid in a range supplement to pregnant beef cows grazing poor-quality winter forage did not significantly alter performance; in addition, lasalocid did not significantly improve forage utilization characteristics in steers grazing similar pasture.


Footnotes

1 The authors express appreciation for the expert assistance of Mr. G. A. Ritter, Mr. W. R. Adolph, Mr. D. J. Whitney and Ms. K. J. Jordan during the course of this study.

2 Contribution no. 87-172-J from the Kansas Agr. Exp. Sta.

3 Appreciation is expressed to Hoffmann-LaRoche Inc., Nutley, NJ for providing products and partial funding for this study.

4 Dept. of Anim. Sci. and Ind.

5 Present address: Alltech Inc., Nicholasville, KY 40356.

6 Address reprint requests to R. C. Cochran, Dept. of Anim. Sci. and Ind., Call Hall.

7 Dept. of Surg. and Med.

8 Dept. of Nuclear Eng.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American Society of Animal Science.