HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Merchen, N. R. Articles by Fernando, R. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Merchen, N. R. Articles by Fernando, R. L.

Effects of Dietary Energy Level and Supplemental Protein Source on Performance of Growing Steers and Nutrient Digestibility and Nitrogen Balance in Lambs¹

University of Illinois³, Urbana 61801

Abstract

Four experiments were conducted to evaluate three crude protein (CP) sources (urea, U; soybean meal, SBM; corn gluten meal, CGM) in diets based on corn silage (high energy) or grass hay (low energy). In Exp. 1 and 2, growing steers were fed all combinations of energy and protein source at 10.5 or 12% CP. Steers fed high energy diets or 12% CP had improved (P<.05) daily gains and feed:gain over 84 d. Protein source had no effect (P>.05) on performance except that steers fed U consumed more (P<.05) feed than those fed CGM. Steers were fed experimental diets to a common weight and switched to an 85% concentrate diet for finishing. During finishing, steers fed low energy diets in the growing period consumed more (P<.05) feed and had increased (P<.05) feed:gain compared with those fed high energy diets. Growing lambs were fed the same diets as steers. At 10.5% CP, lambs fed high energy diets had higher (P<.05) digestibilities of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), nitrogen (N) and fiber components, and retained more (P<.05) N. For lambs on 12% CP, high energy diets had higher (P<.05) DM and OM digestibilities and lower (P<.05) N digestibilities. At 12% CP, energy level had no effect (P>.05) on N retained. Protein source had no effect (P>.05) on N retention. There appeared to be no advantage in supplementing with ruminally undegradable proteins, i.e. CGM, in these experiments.

¹ Research supported in part by the Am. Soybean Assoc, P. O. Box 27300, St. Louis, MO 63141.

² Present address: International Minerals and Chemicals, P. O. Box 207, Terre Haute, IN 47808.

³ Dept. of Anim. Sci.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. R. Legleiter, A. M. Mueller, and M. S. Kerley Level of supplemental protein does not influence the ruminally undegradable protein value J Anim Sci, April 1, 2005; 83(4): 863 - 870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]