J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1987. 64:1638-1647.
© 1987 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stroup, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by Gosey, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stroup, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by Gosey, J. A.

Cyclic Variation in Cattle Feed Intake Data: Characterization and Implications for Experimental Design1

W. W. Stroup2, M. K. Nielsen3 and J. A. Gosey3

University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583-0908

Abstract

Feed intake data were collected every 6 h in a 140-d feeding trial involving two pens of 15 bull calves, each using one Pinpointer single-animal feeding stall per pen. Spectral analysis of these data revealed strong cyclic patterns of feed intake. These patterns were unique to each animal and consisted of two or more cycle lengths, some up to 28 d, for each animal. Feed intake behavior is an important factor in many forms of animal experimentation. Animal researchers frequently use row-column designs, where columns represent animals and rows represent periods. Latin squares and crossover designs are common examples. Standard analysis of variance procedures are appropriate for these experiments only if certain assumptions are met; one is that if cyclic variation is present, it is identical for all animals, i.e., there is no rowxcolumn interaction. If this assumption is not satisfied, standard analysis of variance procedures will result in upward bias of the mean square error and may result in serious distortion of treatment effect estimates. This occurred using the data from the feeding trial reported in this paper. Time-series analysis of covariance greatly improved the accuracy and efficiency of estimates of treatment effects. Consideration of variations in cyclic behavior should be part of the design process in experiments using feed intake data. Guidelines for the design of experiments to take advantage of time-series methodology are given.


Footnotes

1 Published as paper no. 8000, Journal Series, Nebraska Agr. Exp. Lincoln. Appreciation is expressed to S. Johnson for collection of the data.

2 Biometrics and Information Systems Center, Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583-0712.

3 Anim. Sci. Dept., Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583-0908.

4 Pinpointer is the trade name of an electronic recording, individual feed consumption device developed by Agricultural Identification Systems Corp., Cookeville, TN 38501.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. S. Hegarty, J. P. Goopy, R. M. Herd, and B. McCorkell
Cattle selected for lower residual feed intake have reduced daily methane production
J Anim Sci, June 1, 2007; 85(6): 1479 - 1486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American Society of Animal Science.