J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1987. 64:1205-1214.
© 1987 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, W. F.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, D. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Brown, W. F.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, D. B.

Ammoniation or Cane Molasses Supplementation of Low Quality Forages1

W. F. Brown2, J. D. Phillips3 and D. B. Jones4

University of Florida,5

Abstract

Three digestion and two cattle growth studies evaluated ammoniation level or the nutritional value of ammoniated forage relative to nontreated forage plus a molasses-urea supplement. In trial 1, mature limpograss (Hemarthria altissima) was treated with anhydrous ammonia at 0, 2, 3 or 4% of the dry matter (DM), and fed to steers (217 kg) in a digestion trial. Increases (P<.01) in the apparent digestion coefficients of organic matter (OM), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid deter gent fiber (ADF) and hemicellulose (HC) resulting from increased level of ammoniation were significant for the linear contrast. Urea, or cane molasses-urea were added to nontreated limpograss (digestion trial 2, growth trial 1), or rice straw (Oryza sativa, digestion trial 3, growth trial 2) and compared with ammoniated forage (4 g NH3 /100 g DM). Growth trials 1 (63 steers, 220 kg) and 2 (54 steers, 277 kg) lasted 94 and 91 d, respectively. Ammoniation increased (P<.05) apparent digestion coefficients of OM, NDF, ADF and HC compared with nontreated forage plus urea or molasses-urea. Steers fed ammoniated forage had improved (P<.05) DM intake (DMI), daily gain (ADG) and gain/feed (GIF) compared with those fed nontreated forage plus urea. Steers fed ammoniated limpograss had similar (P>.05) DMI but improved (P<.05) ADG and G/F compared with those fed limpograss molasses-urea, while steers fed ammoniated rice straw had similar (P>.05) DMI, ADG and G/F compared with those fed rice Straw molasses-urea. Molasses-urea addition to nontreated forage resulted in similar (P>.05) OM digestibility, but reduced (P<.05) digestibilities of NDF, ADF and HC compared with nontreated forage plus urea. Steers fed limpograss molasses-urea had increased (P<.05) DMI and ADG, but similar (P>.05) G/F compared with those fed limpograss plus urea; steers fed rice straw molasses-urea had improved (P<.05) DMI, ADG and G/F compared with those fed rice straw plus urea. Ammoniation provides an opportunity for improving the feeding value of low quality tropical forages, and offers an option to traditional winter feeding programs of nontreated forage plus molasses-urea.


Footnotes

1 Florida Agr. Exp. Sta. Journal Ser. No. 7426.

2 Assistant Professor of Anim. Sci. Appreciation is expressed to Ms. Toni Wood, Mr. Marvin Richardson and Mr. J. V. McLeod for care and feeding of animals and for laboratory analysis.

3 Present address: 13000 State Road 52, Dade City, FL 33525.

4 Assistant Professor of Agron., Agr. Res. Center, Belle Glade, FL 33430.

5 Agr. Res. and Educ. Center, Ona, FL 33865.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
K. E. Lesmeister and A. J. Heinrichs
Effects of Adding Extra Molasses to a Texturized Calf Starter on Rumen Development, Growth Characteristics, and Blood Parameters in Neonatal Dairy Calves
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2005; 88(1): 411 - 418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American Society of Animal Science.