J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1987. 64:182-190.
© 1987 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tibbetts, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by McCampbell, H. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tibbetts, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by McCampbell, H. C.

Poultry Offal Ensiled with Lactobacillus Acidophilus for Growing and Finishing Swine Diets

G. W. Tibbetts1, R. W. Seerley2 and H. C. McCampbell2

University of Georgia, Athens 30602

Abstract

Poultry offal (heads, feet, viscera) from a broiler processing plant was ground and mixed with corn, dried molasses and a Lactobacillus acidophilus culture. Fermentation was shown to be effective in batch sizes of 3.8, 75.7 and 208.1 liters, as well as a 1,360-kg silo. It was generally complete at 72 h. In trial 1, rats were fed silage mixtures of 60:30:5:5, 45:45:5:5 and 30:60:5:5, offal, corn, molasses and inoculant, respectively. Rats did not gain as well when fed the silage diets (P<.05) as when fed the basal diet; however, the ranking of silages was 45:45, 60:30 and 30:60, offal-to-corn ratio for rat daily gains and feed conversions. In trial 2, growing-finishing pigs were fed the 60:30:5:5 silage at rates of 0, 10, 20 and 30% of the diet. Average daily gains and feed-to-gain ratios were not affected by including offal silage at up to 20% of the diet, but 30% offal silage in diets resulted in depressed gains (P<.05) and increased feed-to-gain ratios. Carcasses were not different among treatments for dressing percentage, length, average backfat and percentage of ham, loin, shoulder, lean cuts and primal cuts. Carcasses from pigs fed 20 and 30% offal silage had significantly darker and firmer loin-eyes than those from control fed pigs. Marbling was higher (P<.05) in loin-eyes from pigs fed 30% offal silage as compared with those from pigs fed 0% offal silage. Percent belly was greater (P<.05) from pigs fed 30% offal silage when compared with bellies from pigs fed 0, 10, or 20% silage. In trial 3, pigs were again fed 0 and 20% poultry offal silage in the diet. Average daily gains, feed-to-gain ratios and carcass merit measurements did not differ significantly among dietary treatments. Metabolizable energy for the offal silage was determined to be 4,391 cal/g for young, growing pigs. Digestible energy, metabolizable energy, crude fiber, phosphorus and nitrogen balance values were higher for the 20% offal silage diet than the control diet. Poultry offal silage is an acceptable feed ingredient that can comprise up to 20% of the diet for growing and finishing swine.


Footnotes

1 Present address: Arkansas State Univ., State University, AR 72467.

2 Dept. of Anim. and Dairy Sci.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American Society of Animal Science.