J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J. Anim Sci. 1986. 63:1108-1118.
© 1986 American Society of Animal Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McWhir, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wilton, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McWhir, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wilton, J. W.

Prediction of Traits at Constant Finish for Performance-Tested Beef Cattle1

J. McWhir2 and J. W. Wilton3

University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada NIG 2W1

Abstract

The relationships of performance in time-constant intervals to that in the full feedlot phase of production and of bulls to steers were studied. Monthly records on 43 bulls and 48 steers for gain, ultrasonic backfat, weight and hip height were collected in the period postweaning to an estimated 6 to 7 mm subcutaneous backfat. Information gathered in the first 140 d (performance test) was used to predict feedlot performance to Canada grade Al finish (7 mm backfat). Traits predicted were days to market finish (DM), weight at market finish (WM), relative growth rate (RGR) and economic rate of maturing (Ke). Economic maturing rate was derived as an estimator of growth relative to weight at fixed body composition (7 mm backfat). Prediction equations were developed by stepwise regression which explained 91, 92, 83 and 79% of the variation in DM, WM, RGR and Ke, respectively. Ratios for steer to bull values for DM and WM were .901 and .928, respectively. It was concluded that accurate prediction of DM, WM, RGR and Ke is possible from information on weight and backfat measurements as currently gathered in many test stations. Prediction of RGR and Ke could be improved by inclusion of heart girth measurements. Differences among animals in Ke are easier to estimate than are differences in rate of maturing, and may be of greater relevance for the genetic improvement of livestock.

Footnotes

1 The statistical assistance of O. B. Allen, technical assistance of C. Watson, A. McBurney and C. Haworth and the financial assistance of the Ontario Cattlemen's Assoc. and Ontario Ministry of Agr. and Food are gratefully acknowledged.

2 Dept. of Med. Biochem., Univ. of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4.

3 Dept. of Anim. and Poul. Sci., Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada NIG 2W1.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Society of Animal Science.