J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1986. 63:770-780.
© 1986 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Turgeon, O. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ferrell, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Turgeon, O. A., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Ferrell, C. L.

Effects of Growth Rate and Compensatory Growth on Body Composition in Lambs1,2,

O. A. Turgeon, Jr., D. R. Brink3, S. J. Bartle4, T. J. Klopfenstein3 and C. L. Ferrell5

University of Nebraska,6, Lincoln 68583-0908 and U.S. Department of Agriculture,5, Clay Center, NE 68933

Abstract

Fifty lambs were used in a comparative slaughter experiment to determine the effects of growth rates and compensatory growth on body composition. The study consisted of a growing and a finishing phase. During the growing phase, lambs (20 to 30 kg) were fed three different concentrate levels (30, 50 or 70%) to gain at three different rates (slow, medium and rapid). The finishing phase was evaluated in two periods (early, 30 to 38 kg; late, 38 to 45 kg). All lambs received 70% concentrate diets during the finishing phase. Groups of five lambs were sacrificed at 20, 30, 38 and 45 kg fleece-free weights for whole-body chemical analysis. At 30 kg live weight, lambs on a rapid growth diet were the fattest (P<.01) and contained the least protein (P<.05) in their empty bodies. The slower the lambs gained during the growing phase, the greater (P<.05) was the response in rate of gain and feed efficiency during both periods of the finishing phase. Compensatory growth occurred in two stages; a greater proportion of protein gain was made early while a greater proportion of the fat gain was made during the late period of the finishing phase.


Footnotes

1 Published with the approval of the Director as Paper No. 7849, Journal Ser., Nebraska Agr. Exp. Sta.

2 The authors gratefully acknowledge Jim Lamkey and Dr. R. W. Mandigo (Univ. of Nebraska) for their aid and assistance in slaughtering the experimental animals.

3 Dept. of Anim. Sci. To whom reprint requests should be addressed.

4 Current address: Texas Tech Univ., Dept. of Anim. Sci., Lubbock, TX 79409.

5 U.S. Meat Anim. Res. Center, Clay Center, NE 68933.

6 Dept. of Anim. Sci.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Society of Animal Science.