J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1986. 63:269-278.
© 1986 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hammer, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Brinster, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hammer, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Brinster, R. L.

Genetic Engineering of Mammalian Embryos1,2,3,

Robert E. Hammer4, Vernon G. Pursel5, Caird E. Rexroad, Jr.5, Robert J. Wall5, Douglas J. Bolt5, Richard D. Palmiter6 and Ralph L. Brinster4

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104

Abstract

A gene consisting of the mouse metallothionein I promoter/regulator (MT) fused to the human growth hormone (hGH) structural gene (MThGH) was microinjected into rabbit, sheep and pig eggs. Visualization of nuclear structures was accomplished by interference-contrast (I-C) microscopy for rabbit and sheep eggs and by centrifugation and I-C microscopy for pig eggs. The gene integrated into the chromosomes of each species with an efficiency of 13% in rabbits, 1% in sheep and 10% in pigs. Human GH mRNA was detected in the liver of transgenic rabbits as well as tail and ear samples of pigs. Immunoreactive hGH was present in the serum of a transgenic rabbit and plasma of most transgenic pigs. In several pigs hGH levels increased between birth and 90 d of age. The presence of substantial quantities of hGH in plasma of pigs did not increase postnatal somatic growth rates. Founder animals will be bred and their transgenic and control progeny used to assess the effects of hGH on feed efficiency and carcass composition. These experiments demonstrate the feasibility of introducing foreign genes into the genome of several animal species by microinjection of eggs.


Footnotes

1 This work was supported in part by grants from USDA (Section 1433 formula funds) and NIH (HD 19018) to R. L. Brinster and NIH (HD 09172) to R. D. Palmiter.

2 We gratefully acknowledge Mary Chandlee, Dennis McDuffie, Anne Powell, Leah Schulman, Myrna Trumbauer, and Mary Yagle for their expert technical assistance and Kenneth Bender, Paul Graninger, Paul Fallon, James Piatt and David Sherman for exceptional animal care.

3 Presented by the senior author at a symposium on "Future Impact of Biotechnology in Animal Science," held August 14, 1985 at the 77th Annu. Meet. of the Amer. Soc. of Anim. Sci., Univ. of Georgia, Athens.

4 Lab. of Reprod. Physiol., School of Vet. Med., Univ. of Pennsylvania.

5 Reprod. Lab., Agr. Res. Serv., USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705.

6 Howard Hughes Med. Inst., Dept. of Biochem., Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
V. Pursel, C. Pinkert, K. Miller, D. Bolt, R. Campbell, R. Palmiter, R. Brinster, and R. Hammer
Genetic engineering of livestock
Science, June 16, 1989; 244(4910): 1281 - 1288.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
R Jaenisch
Transgenic animals
Science, June 10, 1988; 240(4858): 1468 - 1474.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Society of Animal Science.