J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1986. 62:1523-1532.
© 1986 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fredeen, H. T.
Right arrow Articles by Mikami, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fredeen, H. T.
Right arrow Articles by Mikami, H.

Mass Selection in a Pig Population: Correlated Responses in Reproductive Performance1

H. T. Fredeen2 and Hitoshi Mikami3

University of Alberta,4, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6H 2H1

Abstract

Time trends in female reproductive performance were evaluated for a population of 1,203 dams contributing to a nine-generation selection experiment involving replicated lines selected for maximum growth (G), minimum fat (B) and an index (I) combining these two traits. Although inbreeding advanced to substantial levels during the course of this experiment, the regression trends for litter size at birth and weaning were positive and significant (P<=.01) for the I line and near zero for the B and G lines. The line rankings for weaned litter size in the final generation was I>B>G. In comparisons with the control population in this generation, with weaned litter size adjusted for line differences in inbreeding of the dams, the ranking was I>B>G>C. Indirect selection for traits of the sow (e.g., Fx, weights at farrowing and weaning, litter size and weight) was negligible, averaging less than .l{sigma}/generation for most traits. Contrary to expectations, there was no evidence that mass selection favored the retention of breeding stock from litters of above average size. Repeatabilities of litter size and litter weight ranged from .12 ± .04 to .16 ± .04 for data pooled across lines. However, repeatabilities were not uniform for each line, being approximately 50% of the pooled estimates for the G line and ranging around 150% of the pooled estimates for the B line.


Footnotes

1 Research conducted by senior author at the Canada Agr. Res. Sta., Lacombe.

2 Mailing address: Box 1810, Lacombe, Alberta, Canada T0C 1S0.

3 Natl. Res. Council Post-Doctorate Fellow at Lacombe, 1975 to 1977. Present address: Natl. Inst. of Anim. Ind., Tsukuba Norindanchi, P. O. Box 5, Ibaraki 305, Japan.

4 Dept. of Anim. Sci.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
A. Rosendo, L. Canario, T. Druet, J. Gogue, and J. P. Bidanel
Correlated responses of pre- and postweaning growth and backfat thickness to six generations of selection for ovulation rate or prenatal survival in French Large White pigs
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2007; 85(12): 3209 - 3217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
D. B. Petry, J. W. Holl, and R. K. Johnson
Responses to 19 generations of litter size selection in the NE Index line. II. Growth and carcass responses estimated in pure line and crossbred litters
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2004; 82(7): 1895 - 1902.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Society of Animal Science.