J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J. Anim Sci. 1986. 62:958-967.
© 1986 American Society of Animal Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bourdon, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Brinks, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bourdon, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Brinks, J. S.

Scrotal Circumference in Yearling Hereford Bulls: Adjustment Factors, Heritabilities and Genetic, Environmental and Phenotypic Relationships with Growth Traits1

R. M. Bourdon and J. S. Brinks2

Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523

Abstract

Field data on 4,233 yearling Hereford bulls were analyzed using fixed and mixed model least-squares procedures to examine factors affecting scrotal circumference; determine appropriate adjustment factors; and study genetic, environmental and phenotypic relationships among scrotal circumference and growth traits. Scrotal circumference was affected by postweaning feed level; contemporary group/feed level; age of dam; and covariates age, weight and height. Of the three covariates, weight had the greatest effect, and any factor which caused an increase in weight tended to increase scrotal circumference. Quadratic effects of age, weight, height and age x age of dam interaction effects were significant or approached significance, but were of minor importance. Large contemporary group effects suggested the need for expressing scrotal circumferences as trait ratios or as deviations from contemporary group means. Scrotal circumference adjustment factors recommended for yearling Hereford bulls were .026 cm·d-1 of age and .8, .2 and .1 cm for sons of 2-, 3- and 4-yr old dams, respectively. Heritability of weight-adjusted scrotal circumference was .46 ± .06 compared with .49 ± .06 for age-adjusted scrotal circumference, indicating considerable additive genetic variation for relative scrotal size. Correlations between scrotal circumference and growth traits were moderate to high. The genetic correlation between scrotal circumference and yearling weight was the highest of these at .44 ± .16. Potential implications of this relationship are discussed.

Footnotes

1 Approved for publication as Scientific Paper No. 2990 of the Colorado Exp. Sta.

2 The authors acknowledge the cooperation of the Amer. Hereford Assoc. in supplying data and funds for this study.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
C. G. Kealey, M. D. MacNeil, M. W. Tess, T. W. Geary, and R. A. Bellows
Genetic parameter estimates for scrotal circumference and semen characteristics of Line 1 Hereford bulls
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2006; 84(2): 283 - 290.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
J. F. Baker, R. C. Vann, and W. E. Neville Jr.
Evaluations of genotypexenvironment interactions of beef bulls performance-tested in feedlot or pasture
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2002; 80(7): 1716 - 1724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Society of Animal Science.