J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1986. 62:1130-1139.
© 1986 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McGlone, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McGlone, J. J.

Agonistic Behavior in Food Animals: Review of Research and Techniques1,2,

John J. McGlone

Texas Tech University3, Lubbock 79409

Abstract

One type of social behavior—agonistic behavior—is commonly observed among food animals. Agonistic behaviors are those behaviors which cause, threaten to cause or seek to reduce physical damage. Agonistic behavior is comprised of threats, aggression and submission. While any one of these divisions of agonistic behavior may be observed alone, they usually are found, in sequence, from the start to the end of an interaction. Food animals may show interspecific or intraspecific agonistic behaviors. Interspecific agonistic behavior has not been extensively studied but it is agriculturally important because farm workers may become injured or killed by aggressive food animals. Types of intraspecific agonistic behavior are: when animals are brought together, inter-male fighting, resource defense, inter-gender fighting and aberrant aggression. Common pitfalls in research on agonistic behavior among food animals include (1) too few replicates to detect a biological difference, (2) the assumptions of the analysis are not met, (3) only aggression and not submission or other agonistic behavior components are measured, (4) incomplete description of the behaviors are reported and (5) a complete, quantitive ethogram did not form the basis for selecting behavioral measures.


Footnotes

1 Presented at the Symposium on "Design and Analysis of Animal Behavior Studies" at the 76th Annu. Meet. of the Amer. Soc. of Anim. Sci., Univ. of Missouri, Columbia, August 8, 1984.

2 Texas Tech Univ. paper number T-5-191.

3 Dept. of Anim. Sci.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
M. E. Davis, S. C. Sears, J. K. Apple, C. V. Maxwell, and Z. B. Johnson
Effect of weaning age and commingling after the nursery phase of pigs in a wean-to-finish facility on growth, and humoral and behavioral indicators of well-being
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2006; 84(3): 743 - 756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. J. McGlone and D. L. Anderson
Synthetic maternal pheromone stimulates feeding behavior and weight gain in weaned pigs
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2002; 80(12): 3179 - 3183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Society of Animal Science.