J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1986. 62:1113-1119.
© 1986 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mader, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Horn, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mader, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Horn, G. W.

Low-Quality Roughages for Steers Grazing Wheat Pasture. II. Effect of Wheat Forage Intake and Utilization1

T. L. Mader2 and G. W. Horn

Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station3, Stillwater 74078

Abstract

The effects of feeding low-quality roughages (LQR) to 1) steers fed harvested wheat forage in stalls and 2) steers grazing wheat pasture on wheat forage intake, dry matter digestibility (DMD) and dry matter (DM) turnover rate were studied. In the first trial, steers (283 ± 6 kg mean body wt) were kept in digestion stalls and fed either harvested wheat forage or harvested wheat forage plus .64 kg sorghum-Sudan hay (SS) DM/d. Dry matter intake and DMD of wheat forage, were, respectively, 1.96 and 1.97% of body weight and 74.7 and 75.2% for steers fed wheat forage with and without SS. Grazing trials were conducted over a 2-yr period. Steers grazed a common wheat pasture and were fed either no LQR, wheat straw (WS), or SS. Mean daily intakes of WS and SS by steers grazing wheat pasture were .28 and .67 kg DM, respectively. Daily fecal DM output of steers, gastrointestinal tract fill of undigested DM (UDMG), ruminal turnover rate, time delay and total mean retention time (TMRT) of wheat forage in the gastrointestinal tract were estimated using a time-dependent, time-independent model of Yb concentrations in feces following pulse-dosing with ytterbium-labeled wheat forage. Intake of wheat forage was not altered (P>.05) by feeding LQR. Ruminal turnover rate of wheat forage tended to increase and TMRT of wheat forage tended to decrease with feeding a LQR, although differences among treatments were not significant. Ruminal turnover rate of LQR estimated from Cr-mordanted LQR was much slower (1.5 to 2.2 vs 5.3 to 5.4 %/h, P<.05), and TMRT of LQR was much greater (74.5 to 91.7 vs 37.1 to 37.4 h, P<.05) than values for Yb-labeled wheat forage. Results of these studies are interpreted to indicate that consumption of small amounts of LQR by growing cattle on wheat pasture does not alter wheat forage intake or utilization.


Footnotes

1 Journal Article No. 4562 of the Agr. Exp. Sta., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater 74078. Request for reprints should be addressed to G. W. Horn.

2 Present address: Univ. of Nebraska, Northeast Station, Concord 68728.

3 Anim. Sci. Dept.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Professional Animal ScientistHome page
S. J. Winterholler, D. L. Lalman, M. D. Hudson, C. E. Ward, C. R. Krehbiel, and G. W. Horn
Performance, Carcass Characteristics, and Economic Analysis of Calf-Fed and Wheat Pasture Yearling Systems in the Southern Great Plains
Professional Animal Scientist, June 1, 2008; 24(3): 232 - 238.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
D. A. Chabot, C. D. Chabot, L. K. Conway, and S. A. Soto-Navarro
Effect of fat supplementation and wheat pasture maturity on forage intake and digestion characteristics of steers grazing wheat pasture
J Anim Sci, May 1, 2008; 86(5): 1263 - 1270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Society of Animal Science.