J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1986. 62:208-215.
© 1986 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huston, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Huston, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, M. L.

Dynamics of Digestion in Cattle, Sheep, Goats and Deer1

J. E. Huston2, B. S. Rector3, W. C. Ellis4 and M. L. Allen5

Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, San Angelo 76901 and College Station 77843

Abstract

Four experiments were conducted to study factors affecting digestibility of forages in cattle, sheep, goats and white-tailed deer. In a series of digestion trials (Exp. 1), the dry matter digestibility of a moderately high fiber diet was greater in cattle than in deer. Digestibilities of the diet in sheep and goats were intermediate and not different from either extreme. In a second series of trials (Exp. 2), relative organic matter digestibilities were for goats>sheep>deer. However, in Exp. 2, intake in goats was very low and digestibility appeared to be positively related to retention time and inversely related to turnover rate. Results of three trials (Exp. 3) suggested that rate of digestion was related more to diet than to the animal species consuming the diet. In grazing animals (Exp. 4), goats digested a smaller percentage of consumed material than either cows or sheep during three of four seasons even though diets were of similar in vitro digestibility. This difference was related to a faster turnover and shorter retention time in goats. These data support the concept that there are species differences in gastrointestinal dynamics which may be important determinants of adaptability to grazing conditions.


Footnotes

1 Technical Article No. 20445 of the Texas Agr. Exp. Sta., Texas A&M Univ. System, College Station, TX 77843.

2 Texas Agr. Exp. Sta., 7887 N. Highway 87, San Angelo, TX 76901.

3 Dept. of Range Sci., College Station, TX 77843.

4 Dept. of Anim. Sci., College Station, TX 77843.

5 Deceased.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. C. Burns
ASAS Centennial Paper: Utilization of pasture and forages by ruminants: A historical perspective
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2008; 86(12): 3647 - 3663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
D. R. Yanez Ruiz, A. Moumen, A. I. Martin Garcia, and E. Molina Alcaide
Ruminal fermentation and degradation patterns, protozoa population, and urinary purine derivatives excretion in goats and wethers fed diets based on two-stage olive cake: Effect of PEG supply
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2004; 82(7): 2023 - 2032.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Society of Animal Science.