J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1986. 62:147-154.
© 1986 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Solomon, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Solomon, M. B.

Responses of Bovine Muscle to Restraint and Electrical Stimulation

Morse B. Solomon1,2,

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD 20705

Abstract

Two electrical-stimulation (ES) systems, extra low (45V) voltage (LES) and moderate (145V) voltage (MES), were evaluated for their effects on beef carcass quality-indicating characteristics and muscle tenderness. Lean-color problems and heat-ring formation were substantially reduced by both ES systems. However, heat-ring formation was more uniformly controlled with the LES system. Both ES systems produced a rapid drop in muscle pH within the first 5 h postmortem. Shear-force values for different muscles of the carcass (longissimus, semimembranosus, biceps femoris and triceps brachii) indicated that both ES systems improved tenderness. When the carcass was suspended by one leg during ES, the side associated with the shackled leg frequently showed a different response to ES than the companion side. This research encourages successful implementation of low-voltage electrical stimulation for commercial use.


Footnotes

1 Mention of specific equipment does not imply endorsement by the USDA.

2 Meat Sci. Res. Lab., Agr. Res. Serv.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Society of Animal Science.