J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1985. 61:1431-1440.
© 1985 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DeNise, R. S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Brinks, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DeNise, R. S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Brinks, J. S.

Genetic and Environmental Aspects of the Growth Curve Parameters in Beef Cows1,2,

R. S. Kersey DeNise3 and J. S. Brinks4

Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523

Abstract

Brody's growth curve, a three-parameter function, and Richards' function, a four-parameter function, were fit to data from 233 inbred and linecross cows to study the genetic and environmental aspects of the growth curve parameters and to compare the two functions. Fitting Brody's curve was faster and less costly to compute than Richards' function, but Richards' function had smaller sums of squares and a better fit to actual data points. Year of birth had an effect on the A (P<.05), b (P<.01) and k (P<.01) parameters of Brody's curve. Parameter estimates from data of the youngest cows were at the extremes. The b parameter was the largest when estimated from data with no recorded birth weights. Year of birth was also an important effect for the b (P<.01), k (P<.05) and m (P<.01) parameters of Richards' function, but year effects were less interpretable. Mating system affected (P<.01) the A parameter of both functions; inbreds were lighter than linecrosses at maturity. Line of sire was an important source of variation (P<.01) for the A parameter of both functions. The heritability estimate of the A parameter from both functions was .44 ± .27; apparently the same trait in both curves. The estimate for the b parameter from Brody's curve was .39 ± .27, comparable with literature estimates of birth weight. The heritability estimate for k from Brody's curve was .20 ± .26. The heritability estimates for b, k and m parameters from Richards' function were .24 ± .26, .32 ± .27 and .21 ± .26, respectively. The genetic correlations between the A and k parameters in both curves indicated that cows with lighter mature weights reached that weight at younger ages.


Footnotes

1 Published as Paper No. 2957, Journal Series, Colorado Agr. Exp. Sta., Ft. Collins.

2 We gratefully acknowledge the cooperation of Dr. Duane J. Clow who provided the SAAM27 program used to calculate growth curves.

3 Present address: Dept. of Anim. Sci., Univ. of Arizona, Tucson 85721.

4 Dept. of Anim. Sci.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
S. Forni, M. Piles, A. Blasco, L. Varona, H. N. Oliveira, R. B. Lobo, and L. G. Albuquerque
Analysis of beef cattle longitudinal data applying a nonlinear model
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2007; 85(12): 3189 - 3197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Society of Animal Science.