J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1985. 61:1395-1401.
© 1985 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davis, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Turner, T. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Davis, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Turner, T. B.

Adjustment of Postweaning Feed:Gain Ratios of Angus Bulls for Differences in Maintenance Requirements1,2,3,

M. E. Davis4, G. R. Wilson4, W. R. Harvey4 and T. B. Turner

The Ohio State University, Columbus 43210 and Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster 44691

Abstract

Effects of adjusting postweaning feed:gain ratios for differences in maintenance requirements as recommended by the Beef Improvement Federation were examined utilizing 171 individually fed, purebred Angus buUs. The residual correlation (year and sire effects removed) between unadjusted and adjusted feed efficiency was .85 (P<.01). The Spearman correlation between ranks of the bulls based on the two measures of efficiency was .79 (P<.01). Although product-moment and rank correlations between unadjusted and adjusted feed:gain ratios were large, the two methods of evaluating efficiency often identified different bulls as being among the four most or four least efficient in the conversion of feed into postweaning gain. When unadjusted feed:gain ratios were used to evaluate efficiency, bulls that were more efficient were lighter in weight at the beginning of the 140-d postweaning performance test, gained more rapidly and consumed less feed during the test, and were taller and leaner at the conclusion of the test. When differences due to maintenance requirements were removed, bulls that gained more rapidly and were heavier, taller and slightly fatter at the end of the test were superior in the conversion of feed into postweaning gain. Correlations of on-test weight and feed consumption with adjusted feed:gain ratios were near zero. On-test age was not closely related to either adjusted or unadjusted feed efficiency.


Footnotes

1 Salaries and research support provided by State and Federal Funds appropriated to the Ohio Agr. Res. and Dev. Center, The Ohio State Univ. Journal Article No. 208-84.

2 The experiment was a contributing project to North Central Regional Project NC-1, "The Improvement of Beef Cattle Through Breeding Methods."

3 The authors wish to thank Mr. C. B. Boyles and Mr. J. D. Wells for their excellent technical assistance.

4 Anim. Sci. Dept., The Ohio State Univ., Columbus 43210.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Society of Animal Science.