J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1985. 61:1354-1363.
© 1985 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holloway, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Backus, W. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Holloway, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Backus, W. L.

Breed x Nutritional Environment Interactions for Beef Female Weight and Fatness, Milk Production and Calf Growth1

J. W. Holloway2, W. T. Butts, Jr.3, J. R. McCurley4, E. E. Beaver5, H. L. Peeler6 and W. L. Backus7

University of Tennessee and U.S. Department of Agriculture, Knoxville, TN 37901

Abstract

Female weight, fatness, milk production and calf growth were measured to determine seasonal patterns for 120 Angus, Hereford, Angus x Hereford and Hereford x Angus 2-yr-old females grazing fescue or 60% fescue-40% legume. Females calved January through March and calves were weaned in October in each of the 3 yr of the experiment. Preliminary analyses indicated that Angus x Hereford and Hereford x Angus females responded in a similar manner for all variables measured. Angus-Hereford females responded to increased nutrient supply provided by fescue-legume pasture (as compared with fescue) by increasing (P<.05) fatness, especially during late spring, and, to a lesser degree, by increasing (P<.05) milk production and calf growth. Hereford and Angus females, however, responded by increasing (P<.05) milk production (especially during mid-lactation) and calf growth and, to a lesser degree, by increasing (P>.05) fatness. These differential responses resulted in large differences in heterosis for the two pasture types. Calculated heterosis values were relatively large for average female weight and fatness of females grazing fescue-legume, and for weaning weight for these grazing fescue.


Footnotes

1 Published with the approval of the Director of the Tennessee Agr. Exp. Sta.

2 Present address: Texas Agr. Exp. Sta., Uvalde, TX 78801.

3 Present address: USDA-ARS, Brooksville Beef Cattle Res. Sta., Brooksville, FL 33512.

4 Present address: Div. of Anim. Sci., West Virginia Univ., Morgantown, WV 26506.

5 Present address: Anim. Sci. Dept., Univ. of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65201.

6 Present address: 1202 Poplar Street, Selmer, TN 38375.

7 Anim. Sci. Dept.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
E. E. Grings, A. J. Roberts, T. W. Geary, and M. D. MacNeil
Milk yield of primiparous beef cows from three calving systems and varied weaning ages
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2008; 86(3): 768 - 779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Society of Animal Science.