|
|
||||||||
North Carolina State University2, Raleigh 27695-7621
Abstract
Correlated responses to selection for increased litter size were studied in mice. The selected line (L*) was compared with an unselected control line (K') in two experiments. The first experiment provided a profile of correlated changes in female reproductive traits at d 0, 6, 14 and 18 of gestation. Experiment two examined the effects of ovariectomy on d 18 of gestation, sham surgery and no surgery on litter size and maternal performance. Females of the L+ line had increased (P<.001) body weight, ovulation rate and uterine length at d 0 of gestation compared with K' females, but uterine weight and ovarian weight did not differ. Positive correlated responses (P<.001) in uterine weight and length at d 6 and 14 of gestation were associated with a larger number of viable fetuses. Space per fetus was reduced (P<.001) in the uterus of L+ females, but a lower fetal mortality was still maintained in L+ throughout gestation. Prenatal survival was about 10% higher (P<.06) in L+, the major difference (P<.01) occurring before implantation. A second experiment was conducted to determine the effect of ovariectomy on d 18 on litter size and maternal performance. In experiment two, no significant line x treatment interactions were found for maternal performance, indicating that both lines responded similarly to ovariectomy, line L+ showed a positive correlated response in maternal performance. Ovariectomized females had a reduced (P<.05) number born alive compared with sham-operated females, but the nonsurgically treated females were intermediate. The smaller number born in ovariectomized females leads to an overestimate of cumulative mortality at 18 d of gestation. Pup birth weight was lower (P<.05) in ovariectomized females, perhaps because of a slightly reduced length of gestation. Ovariectomy had no detrimental effect on postnatal maternal performance.
1 Paper No. 9720 of the Journal Series of the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, Raleigh, 27695-7601. The use of trade names in this publication does not imply endorsement by the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service of the products named, nor criticism of similar ones not mentioned.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |