J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1985. 61:725-741.
© 1985 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferrell, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Jenkins, T. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ferrell, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Jenkins, T. G.

Cow Type and the Nutritional Environment: Nutritional Aspects1

C. L. Ferrell and T. G. Jenkins2

U.S. Department of Agriculture,3, Clay Center, NE 68933

Abstract

Numerous studies have been reported that relate to the influence of cattle type on production efficiency; however, most reported studies have been concerned with output characteristics. This review concentrates on the influence of cattle type on the input requirements and more specifically, energy requirements. Data are presented that show that energy is required for maintenance, growth, gestation and lactation and requirements for each of these functions vary among cattle types. Data are presented that suggest 70 to 75% of total annual energy requirements are required for maintenance functions and variation in requirements for maintenance appear to be greater than variation in requirements for growth, gestation or lactation. In general, variation in maintenance requirements appears to be positively associated with genetic potential for measures of production, e.g., rate of growth or milk production. Reported results suggest that animals having genetic potential for high productivity may have less advantage or be at a disadvantage in a more restrictive environment, suggesting the need for synchronization of production environment and germ plasm resources. Some of the sources of variation in maintenance requirements have been discussed. Data are cited that suggest little of the variation in maintenance energy expenditures is attributable to variation in total body composition per se. However, considerable evidence has accumulated to show that a relatively large proportion of maintenance energy expenditures can be attributed to energy expenditures of visceral organs, especially the liver and gastrointestinal tract. High rates of energy expenditures of these tissues appear to be directly or indirectly associated with the high rates of protein synthesis in these tissues. Greater use of differing research approaches and assimilation of the results are needed to develop an understanding of the reasons for variation among animals in maintenance energy expenditures or energetic efficiency.


Footnotes

1 Presented at a symposium on "Cow Type and the Nutritional Environment" held August 8, 1984, at the 76th Annu. Meet. of the Amer. Soc. Anim. Sci., Univ. of Missouri, Columbia.

2 The secretarial assistance of Kathy Leising in the preparation of this manuscript is appreciated.

3 Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, ARS.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. L. Martin, K. W. Creighton, J. A. Musgrave, T. J. Klopfenstein, R. T. Clark, D. C. Adams, and R. N. Funston
Effect of prebreeding body weight or progestin exposure before breeding on beef heifer performance through the second breeding season
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2008; 86(2): 451 - 459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
L. Calegare, M. M. Alencar, I. U. Packer, and D. P. D. Lanna
Energy requirements and cow/calf efficiency of Nellore and Continental and British Bos taurus x Nellore crosses
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2007; 85(10): 2413 - 2422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. J. Reed, M. A. Ward, K. A. Vonnahme, T. L. Neville, S. L. Julius, P. P. Borowicz, J. B. Taylor, D. A. Redmer, A. T. Grazul-Bilska, L. P. Reynolds, et al.
Effects of selenium supply and dietary restriction on maternal and fetal body weight, visceral organ mass and cellularity estimates, and jejunal vascularity in pregnant ewe lambs
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2007; 85(10): 2721 - 2733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
T. G. Jenkins and C. L. Ferrell
Daily dry matter intake to sustain body weight of mature, nonlactating, nonpregnant cows
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2007; 85(7): 1787 - 1792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
F. C. P. Castro Bulle, P. V. Paulino, A. C. Sanches, and R. D. Sainz
Growth, carcass quality, and protein and energy metabolism in beef cattle with different growth potentials and residual feed intakes
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2007; 85(4): 928 - 936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. M. McDonald and M. K. Nielsen
Correlated responses in maternal performance following divergent selection for heat loss in mice
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2006; 84(2): 300 - 304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
S. R. Wesolowski, M. F. Allan, M. K. Nielsen, and D. Pomp
Evaluation of hypothalamic gene expression in mice divergently selected for heat loss
Physiol Genomics, April 16, 2003; 13(2): 129 - 137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
B. S. Obeidat, M. G. Thomas, D. M. Hallford, D. H. Keisler, M. K. Petersen, W. D. Bryant, M. D. Garcia, L. Narro, and R. Lopez
Metabolic characteristics of multiparous Angus and Brahman cows grazing in the Chihuahuan Desert
J Anim Sci, September 1, 2002; 80(9): 2223 - 2233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Society of Animal Science.