J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1985. 61:552-558.
© 1985 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brumm, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Brumm, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, R. K.

Reduced Nocturnal Temperatures for Early Weaned Pigs1, 2, 3,

M. C. Brumm4, D. P. Shelton5 and R. K. Johnson4

University of Nebraska Northeast Station, Concord 68728

Abstract

Three experiments of 5 wk duration were conducted to evaluate the effect of reduced nocturnaltemperatures (RNT) on weaned pig performance. Treatments were 1) a control regimen (CR) of 30 C constant air temperature lowered 2 C/wk and 2) a regimen where the temperature from 1900 to 0700 h was lowered to 25 C for three nights followed by 20 C for four nights during the first week and then lowered 1 C/wk thereafter (RNT). Weaned pigs averaging 23 ± 2 d of age at the start of the experiments gained faster (P<.01) in the RNT treatment vs the CR treatment in Exp. 1, 2 and 3, respectively (.32 vs .28; .39 vs .37; .35 vs .34 kg/d). The improvement in gain was accompanied by an increase (P<.005) in feed intake for the same period (.48 vs .44; .61 vs .55; .58 vs .54 kg/d). There was no difference in feed conversion. Weaned pigs that were 1.9 to 2.3 kg lighter initially gained slower (P<.0005) compared with their heavier contemporaries (.27 vs .33; .33 vs .43 and .31 vs .33 kg/d) in Exp. 1, 2 and 3, respectively. This reduced gain was accompanied by a reduced (P<.0005) feed intake (.40 vs .51; .50 vs .66; .50 vs .62 kg/d). There was no interaction of initial weight and temperature regimen.


Footnotes

1 Journal paper no. 7545, Univ. of Nebraska Agr. Exp. Sta.

2 The authors acknowledge the assistance of Mr. Dennis Forsberg with animal care and Mr. Dave Pankaskie with data collection and analysis.

3 Funded in part by a grant from the Nebraska Pork Producers Association, Lincoln, NE 68583.

4 Dept. of Anim. Sci.

5 Dept. of Agr. Eng.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Society of Animal Science.