J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1985. 61:354-357.
© 1985 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meeker, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Christian, L. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meeker, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Christian, L. L.

Breed Differences in Return to Estrus after PGF2 {alpha}-Induced Abortions in Swine1,2,

D. L. Meeker, M. F. Rothschild and L. L. Christian

Iowa State University, Ames 50011

Abstract

Fifty-seven Duroc, 41 Landrace and 38 Yorkshire purebred sows in d 10 to 53 of pregnancy were aborted to synchronize estrus by using prostaglandin F2{alpha} (PGF2{alpha}). Breed differences in time between injection of two 10-mg doses of PGF2{alpha} and return to estrus were observed in these three breeds of pregnant sows during two breeding seasons. Duroc sows returned to estrus .9 d faster (P<.01) than Yorkshire and 1.3 d faster (P<.01) than Landrace sows. Seasonal differences were also observed. The mean days from injection to estrus were 1.8 d fewer (P<.01) for the spring season than in the fall season. All sows expressed estrus 5 to 11 d after injection. Normal gestation, parturition and piglet survival were observed in the sows after the treatment. Genetic differences in response to induced abortion and return to estrus could have implications in planned breeding and farrowing systems.


Footnotes

1 Journal Paper No. J-11576 of the Iowa Agr. and Home Econ, Exp. Sta., Ames. Project No. 2594.

2 The authors gratefully acknowledge the Upjohn Co., Kalamazoo, MI, for supplying part of the Lutalyse® used for this research.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Society of Animal Science.