J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1985. 61:337-342.
© 1985 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moser, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hagen, C. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moser, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hagen, C. D.

Response of Growing-Finishing Pigs to Decreasing Floor Space Allowance and(or) Virginiamycin in Diet1,2,

R. L. Moser, S. G. Cornelius, J. E. Pettigrew, Jr., H. E. Hanke3 and C. D. Hagen

University of Minnesota4, St. Paul 55108

Abstract

Five hundred forty crossbred pigs were utilized in four trials (10 replications) at two stations to determine the separate and interacting effects of decreasing floor space allowance with or without the addition of virginiamycin to the diet on performance of growing-finishing pigs. Pigs were allowed .37, .33 or .28 m2/pig during the growing phase (23 to 55 kg) and .74, .66, .56 m2/pig during the finishing phase (55 to 100 kg) and fed either a corn-soybean meal control diet or the control diet plus 11 mg of virginiamycin/kg of diet. Floor space allowances were achieved by varying pen size, so the number of pigs and feeder space per pig were constant for all pens. During the growing phase, daily gain (P<.01) daily feed intake (P<.05) and feed conversion ratio (P<.05) decreased as floor space allowance decreased. During the finishing phase and for the total test period, daily gain (P<.01) and feed conversion ratio (P<.05) were reduced but daily feed intake was not affected (P>.05) by restricted floor space allowance. The addition of virginiamycin to the diet had no effect on pig performance. The virginiamycin x floor space allowance interaction was not significant, suggesting that pigs fed a diet with or without virginiamycin responded similarly to restricted floor space allowance. The data suggest that the addition of virginiamycin to the diet was ineffective in overcoming the decrease in performance of growing-finishing pigs caused by crowded conditions.


Footnotes

1 Paper No. 13,996, Scientific Journal Series, Minnesota Agr. Exp. Sta.

2 This research was supported in part by a grant from SmithKline Animal Health Products, Philadelphia, PA.

3 West Central Exp. Sta., Univ. of Minnesota, Morris 56267.

4 Dept. of Anim. Sci.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
H. W. Gonyou, M. C. Brumm, E. Bush, J. Deen, S. A. Edwards, T. Fangman, J. J. McGlone, M. Meunier-Salaun, R. B. Morrison, H. Spoolder, et al.
Application of broken-line analysis to assess floor space requirements of nursery and grower-finisher pigs expressed on an allometric basis
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2006; 84(1): 229 - 235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Society of Animal Science.