HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Vesely, J. A. Articles by Swierstra, E. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Vesely, J. A. Articles by Swierstra, E. E.

Year-Round Breeding of Crossbred Dorset or Finnish Landrace Ewes Using a Synthetic Light Regimen

Agriculture Canada Research Station, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada T1J 4B1

Abstract

A group of crossbred Dorset or Finnish Landrace ewes maintained under a synthetic light regimen (Light Treatment, 4 mo long days - 16 h light, 4 mo short days - 8 h light) and exposed to rams every 8 mo (January 1, September 1, May 1) was compared for lamb production over a period of 4.5 yr with two other comparable groups under natural daylight conditions, one exposed to rams once a year in the fall (Control I) and the other every 8 mo (Control II). Conception rates across breed type of ewe were 92% for Control I, 66% for Control II and 83% for Light Treatment ewes. Conception rates for May breedings only were 16% in Control II and 88% in Light Treatment ewes. Prolificacies of crossbred Finn ewes were higher (P<.05) than those in crossbred Dorset ewes of Control I (258 vs 193%), Control II (187 vs 165%) and Light Treatment (238 vs 163%). The annual production at lambing from the crossbred Finn and Dorset ewes in Control I was 251 and 206 lambs/100 ewes exposed to rams, respectively. Corresponding productions were 231 and 178 for Control II and 296 and 211 for Light Treatment ewes. Mortality of lambs from the crossbred Finn ewes (27%) was higher (P<.01) than that from the crossbred Dorset ewes (12%). Annual attrition of the crossbred Dorset ewes in Control I, Control II and Light Treatment groups was 5.2, 5.4 and 5.4%, respectively. Corresponding percentages of the crossbred Finn ewes were 7.0, 8.8 and 11.2. Overall assessment in productivity, expressed as kilograms of lamb marketed/ewe, was 243 for the crossbred Finn and 257 for the crossbred Dorset ewes (P>.05). The same trait across breedtype of ewe for Controls I and II and Light Treatment was 243, 241 and 266 kg (P>.05). Light control was a reliable agent for induction of estrus, but ewe and lamb management procedures must be optimized in orde to capitalize on additional lambs.