J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1985. 61:297-306.
© 1985 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Senft, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rittenhouse, L. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Senft, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rittenhouse, L. R.

A Model of Thermal Acclimation in Cattle1

R. L. Senft2 and L. R. Rittenhouse

Colorado State University3, Fort Collins 80523,4

Abstract

A model of temperature effects on cattle daily feed intake has been developed that takes into account (1) time course of thermal acclimation and (2) behavioral responses to short-term thermal stress (STTS). The key difference between this model and the classical intake-temperature model is its consideration of the acclimation state of the animal. Time course of physiological acclimation is represented by a running average temperature. The STTS is defined as the difference between the current acclimated temperature [Taccvi(L)] and current daily mean temperature (Ti). Ruminants were postulated as decreasing activity in response to STTS. An empirical relationship between daily feed intake (I) and environmental temperature was derived as:



Formula

Length of the acclimation period, L, and value of the behavioral response coefficient, b', were determined for grazing time of free-roaming cattle and feed intake of five breeds of feedlot cattle. Cattle breeds displayed apparent differences in L but no significant differences in b'. Feeding situation (feedlot vs free-roaming) had a significant effect on b' in cattle, but not on L. Because of explicit treatment of acclimation and stress, two-dimensional representation of thermal environment may be a more meaningful expression of effective environmental temperature in fluctuating environments than mean daily temperature alone. This model may have value in the interpretation of laboratory studies, as well as field studies, because the time frame of experiments will influence the results obtained, depending upon the acclimation state of the animal.


Footnotes

1 This research was supported in part by National Science Foundation Grant DEB-7906009 and the Colorado State Univ. Exp. Sta. and is published as Scientific Series Paper No. 2937.

2 Present address: Anim., Dairy and Vet. Sci. Dept., Utah State Univ., Logan.

3 Dept. of Range Sci.

4 The authors wish to thank Larry Foster, New Mexico State Univ. for providing data for feedlot cattle. We thank D. Swift, D. Robertshaw, D. R. Ames, Colorado State Univ. and D. L. Baker, Colorado Division of Wildlife, for their review of and comments on an earlier draft of this paper. We thank the Central Plains Experimental Range, USDA-ARS, for cooperation and assistance in obtaining information on activities of free-roaming cattle.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Society of Animal Science.