J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1985. 61:107-112.
© 1985 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilton, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by McWhir, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wilton, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by McWhir, J.

Individual and Progeny Measurements of Growth in Station and Herd Tests1

J. W. Wilton2 and J. McWhir2

University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada NIG 2W1

Abstract

Data on 99 Hereford sires and 466 sons, from a total of 9,761 bulls tested for growth rate in central test stations, were analyzed to estimate heritability. In addition, 50 performance-tested bulls had subsequent progeny proofs in herds on record of performance. A total of 411 tested and untested bulls had both progeny proofs from herd information and from sons tested in central stations. The heritability of gain on test in stations as estimated from sire-son regression was .50. The correlation between individual performance compared with contemporaries in the station and subsequent progeny performance as measured by Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (BLUP) was .20 for weaning weight, .16 for postweaning gain and .20 for yearling weight. Correlations for post-weaning gain and yearling weight were close to expectation based on numbers of progeny, levels of heritability and genetic correlations appropriate to field records, while the correlation value for weaning weight was higher than expectation. The correlations of the average performance of sons in stations with evaluations by BLUP were also close to expectation.


Footnotes

1 The computing assistance of H. Song and the financial assistance of Agriculture Canada and the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food are gratefully acknowledged.

2 Dept. of Anim. and Poul. Sci.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Society of Animal Science.