| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University,2, Blacksburg 24061 and Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University,5, Richmond 23298
Abstract
Two experiments were conducted to examine the efficacy of microencapsulation of bovine spermatozoa for use in artificial insemination. In Exp. 1, sperm were encapsulated at three different concentrations (45, 90 and 180 x 106 sperm/ml) in either .75- or 1.5-mm (diameter) microcapsules and incubated in vitro for 24 h at 37 C. Unencapsulated samples of each concentration served as controls. Capsule contents were evaluated for percentage of sperm motility and intact acrosomes at 2, 12 and 24 h of incubation. Capsule fragility was evaluated after 24 h incubation. Viability of spermatozoa was not influenced by sperm concentration or capsule size, and compared with controls, cellular injury after encapsulation was not apparent. Fragility of capsules was unaffected by capsule size; however, as the sperm concentration increased, integrity of the capsules decreased (P<.05). In Exp. 2, using frozen-thawed semen, the effect of egg yolk content, presence of glycerol and viability of spermatozoa on the success of microencapsulation was measured. The extender was 2.9% sodium citrate with glycerol (7% v/v) and either 0, 5, 10 or 15% egg yolk (v/v). Uniformity of capsules in size and shape was evaluated subjectively. Capsule integrity and uniformity were unaffected by glycerol, sperm viability or egg yolk level up to 10% v/v; however, encapsulation of spermatozoa in 15%-yolk buffer increased the heterogeneity in capsule size and shape. Viability of encapsulated spermatozoa was maximal for extenders containing 10 or 15% yolk v/v. Reduced viability for the 5% yolk extender was due to pre-encapsulation injury associated with freezing. Microencapsulation procedures are compatible with sperm viability and can be adapted to an acceptable extender system used in artificial insemination.
1 This research was supported in part by a grant from Select Sires Inc., Plain City, OH 43064. Appreciation is expressed to June Mullins for her technical assistance, to Dr. R. Pearson for advice on statistical analysis, and Mr. Clifton Marshall for technical advice.
3 Present address: Anim. Sci. Dept., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695.
4 To whom requests should be addressed.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
