J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1985. 60:40-57.
© 1985 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fogarty, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by Young, L. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fogarty, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by Young, L. D.

Lamb Production and Its Components in Pure Breeds and Composite Lines. III. Genetic Parameters1

N. M. Fogarty2, G. E. Dickerson3 and L. D. Young4

University of Nebraska and US Department of Agriculture, Lincoln 68583-0908

Abstract

Estimates of repeatability, heritability and phenotypic and genetic correlations were obtained for various maternal measures of lamb production and their component traits: fertility, litter size, neonatal and preweaning survival and weaning weight. The data comprised 10,959 ewe breeding season records at four seasons over 4 yr on 4,219 ewes that were the progeny of 412 sires in five breeds and two 1/2 Finnsheep composite stocks. Intraclass correlation estimates of repeatability were .05 to .06 (± .01) for number and weight of lamb weaned per ewe exposed and ranged from .06 to .15 (± .02) for the various components. Regression estimates of repeatability were higher than the intraclass correlation estimates for most traits. Half-sib heritability estimates for single ewe records were .03 ± .02 for number and .06 ± .02 for weight of lamb weaned per ewe exposed, .06 ± .02 for fertility, .11 ± .04 for litter size, .02 ± .04 for neonatal survival, .07 ± .04 for preweaning survival and .10 ± .05 for lamb weaning weights. Corresponding estimates for lifetime performance were: .06 ± .05, .15 ± .05, .09 ± .05, .16 ± .06, .10 ± .05, .15 ± .06 and .13 ± .07, respectively. Heritability estimates of most traits increased with parity. Regressions of daughter on dam mean performance agreed with half-sib heritabilities for litter size and weaning weight, but were smaller for fertility, lamb survival and number and weight of lambs weaned per ewe exposed. Phenotypic and genetic correlations among all traits indicated that all component traits contributed to phenotypic variation in number and weight of lamb weaned per ewe exposed, but that lamb survival and weaning weight were more important than fertility and litter size in predicting breeding values for ewe productivity under the semi-intensive accelerated lambing management.


Footnotes

1 Published as Paper No. 7380. Journal Ser., Nebraska Agr. Exp. Sta., Lincoln. Partial publication of the Ph.D. dissertation of the senior author.

2 Present address: N.S.W. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Station, Cowra 2794, Australia.

3 Roman L. Hruska US Meat Anim. Res. Center, ARS, USDA, 225 Marvel Baker Hall, Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583-0908.

4 Roman L. Hruska US Meat Anim. Res. Center, ARS, USDA, P.O. Box 166, Clay Center, NE 68933.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Society of Animal Science.