J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1947. 6:154-160.
© 1947 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Branton, C.
Right arrow Articles by Salisbury, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Branton, C.
Right arrow Articles by Salisbury, G. W.

Morphology of Spermatozoa from Different Levels of the Reproductive Tract of the Bull1

Cecil Branton2 and G. W. Salisbury

Cornell University3

Abstract

Studies were made on the morphological characteristics of spermatozoa from the reproductive tracts of 21 bulls of different ages. Fertility of only 3 of these bulls was known. Information on the source of morphologically abnormal spermatozoa and the relative proportions of morphologically abnormal spermatozoa, excluding tailless spermatozoa, and spermatozoa with attached protoplasmic droplets was secured.

It was found that the various levels of the reproductive tract of the bull did not differ significantly in the proportions of abnormal spermatozoa and that the predominant types of abnormals were those affecting the heads of the spermatozoa. It was, therefore, concluded that the testis is the original source of morphologically abnormal spermatozoa.

All bulls studied had three types of spermatozoa as to the location of the protoplasmic droplet. There was no significant statistical difference between bulls as to the proportion of spermatozoa with attached droplets at any given level of the tract. However, the droplet was usually located on the neck of spermatozoa from the head of the epididymis, and was usually absent from ampullar spermatozoa.


Footnotes

1 The data contained in this paper are from a thesis presented by the senior author to the Graduate School of Cornell University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Agriculture, 1946.

2 This author wishes to acknowledge his indebtedness to Professor C. B. Knodt, Department of Dairy Husbandry, Pennsylvania State College, State College, Pa. for help in planning and conducting these investigations.

3 Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Artificial Insemination, Department of Animal Husbandry, Cornell University, Ithaca, N. Y.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T.G. Cooper
Cytoplasmic droplets: the good, the bad or just confusing?
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2005; 20(1): 9 - 11.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. G. Cooper, C.-H. Yeung, S. Fetic, A. Sobhani, and E. Nieschlag
Cytoplasmic droplets are normal structures of human sperm but are not well preserved by routine procedures for assessing sperm morphology
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2004; 19(10): 2283 - 2288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1947 by the American Society of Animal Science.