J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1984. 59:1373-1380.
© 1984 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ritter, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ritter, R. C.

The Role of the Rat in Research on Control of Ingestion: A Commentary and Review of Recent Advances in Understanding Brain Control of Food Intake1

Robert C. Ritter

University of Idaho2, Moscow 83843 and Washington State University,3, Pullman 99164

Abstract

The majority of data concerning the control of food intake in mammals is derived from studies of laboratory rats. Some ingestive controls, identified in rats, seem to operate identically in most farm species. Other controls, which have been identified in nonrodent species, appear to be absent in the rat. Thinking about the neural control of ingestion in agricultural species is based almost entirely on inferences drawn from experiments performed with rats. Recent studies of brain substrates of ingestive control have revealed a prominent role for the caudal hindbrain. Recognition of the caudal hindbrain's participation in the control of ingestion emphasizes the longitudinal integration of brain control of ingestion. Consequently, we must refrain from assuming that the basal forebrain is the unique site for brain control of ingestion. Progress in the investigation of the neural controls of food intake will continue to depend heavily on studies in the rat. Such studies can speed the development of understanding of ingestive controls in farm species by prescribing critical comparative studies. Lack of circumspection prior to initiation and interpretation of such comparative studies can lead, however, to costly misreading of the pattern of ingestive physiology in farm species.


Footnotes

1 Presented at a symposium on "Controls of Feeding in Farm Animals" held July 27, 1983 at the 75th Annu. Meet. Amer. Soc. Anim. Sci., Washington State Univ., Pullman.

2 WOI Regional Program in Vet. Med. Education.

3 Dept. of Vet. Comp. Anat., Pharmacol, and physiol.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
H. D. Sun, M. Malabunga, J. R. Tonra, R. DiRenzo, F. E. Carrick, H. Zheng, H.-R. Berthoud, O. P. McGuinness, J. Shen, P. Bohlen, et al.
Monoclonal antibody antagonists of hypothalamic FGFR1 cause potent but reversible hypophagia and weight loss in rodents and monkeys
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, March 1, 2007; 292(3): E964 - E976.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American Society of Animal Science.