J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J. Anim Sci. 1984. 59:1060-1069.
© 1984 American Society of Animal Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Slanger, W. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Slanger, W. D.

Evidence against Chronic Teat Stimulation as an Autonomous Effector of Diminished Gonadotropin Release in Beef Cows1,2,

G. L. Williams3, J. D. Kirsch, G. R. Post, J. E. Tilton and W. D. Slanger

North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105

Abstract

The current experiment was performed to examine the acute and cumulative effects of chronic manual teat stimulation on the tonic pattern of luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion in beef cows. Additionally, we characterized the plasma profile of prolactin and cortisol release to evaluate whether changes in the concentrations of these hormones occurred in response to teat stimulation and whether such changes were related to gonadotropin secretion. Six weeks after ovariectomy, nonlactating beef females were paired by age and assigned randomly to a control group (n=3) or a stimulation group (n=3). Stimulated cows were subjected to 20 min of continuous manual teat stripping every 4 h for 24 h. Blood samples were collected from all cows at 10-min intervals beginning 1 h before and continuing for 2 h after the onset of each stimulation period in treated animals. Numerous episodes of prolactin and cortisol release were observed in control and treated animals throughout the 24-h experiment. The percentage of stimulations accompained by prolactin and cortisol releases for each of the three treated animals was 100 and 100, 16.7 and 50, and 50 and 100, respectively. The number of prolactin peaks observed the hour after onset of teat stimulation was greater (P<.06) than the number observed the hour before. However, the number of cortisol peaks was not statistically related to teat stimulation. Overall, mean concentrations of prolactin and cortisol were not increased by teat stimulation. Luteinizing hormone pulse frequency (1.6 ± .1 pulses/h) and mean LH concentrations (12.1 ± .6 ng/ml) were not acutely or chronically affected by teat stimulation and were not related to prolactin or cortisol release. We conclude that mechanical stimulation of the teat is not singly effective in altering the pattern or quantity of tonic LH release in ovariectomized cows.

Footnotes

1 Published with the approval of the Director of the North Dakota Agr. Exp. Sta.

2 Appreciation is expressed to Dr. D. J. Bolt and Dr. J. J. Reeves, respectively, for prolactin and LH antisera and to the NIAMDD for pituitary hormones.

3 Reprint requests. Dept. of Anim. Sci.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American Society of Animal Science.