J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1984. 59:361-365.
© 1984 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Calvert, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Bradford, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Calvert, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Bradford, G. E.

Composition of Growth in Mice with a Major Gene for Rapid Postweaning Gain

C. C. Calvert, T. R. Famula and G. E. Bradford

University of California1, Davis 95616

Abstract

Previous research from this laboratory identified the existence of a major gene for rapid growth in mice. This trait is expressed as rapid postweaning growth and is inherited as a single recessive gene, designated hg. The hg/hg males and females had greater (P<.05) body weights at 49-d of age as compared with their Hg/- counterparts; 45.6 ± .64 and 34.0 ± .64 vs 33.2 ± .23 and 27.3 ± .15 g, respectively. Twenty-four male littermate pairs (hg/hg and Hg/-) were euthanized at 49 d of age for determination of carcass composition. Percentage body water was not affected by genotype (hg/hg, 66.7 ± .5; Hg/-, 67.8 ± .3). However, there was a decrease (P<.05) in percentage body protein (20.2 ± .1 vs 20.8 ± .1) and body ash (3.4 ± .01 vs 3.7 ± .01) in hg/hg males as compared with Hg/- males, while percentage lipid was significantly increased in hg/hg males (8.7 ± .5 vs 6.7 ± .3). When carcass weights were adjusted for differences in dry weight, only body protein was significantly affected by genotype, being greater for hg/hg males (8.54 ± .19 vs 7.70 ± .19 g). All other components of body composition were not affected by genotype. The regression coefficient for the covariate of dry weight was significantly different from zero for all carcass components. However, there was no significant difference in the regression coefficient between Hg/- and hg/hg males for each component. The hg/hg mice were not obese suggesting that these mice may be a valuable model for the study of genetic influences upon growth rate and mature body weight.


Footnotes

1 Dept. of Anim. Sci.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American Society of Animal Science.