HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lamberson, W. R. Articles by Johnson, R. K. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Lamberson, W. R. Articles by Johnson, R. K.

Preweaning Survival in Swine: Heritability of Direct and Maternal Effects¹

University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583

Abstract

The heritabilities of direct and maternal effects on litter survival to weaning (LS) were estimated from records of 1,243 litters of pigs from the Nebraska Gene Pool population born from 1968 to 1981. Heritabilities were estimated by: (1) weighted least-squares regressions of average survival for litters of sons on average survival for litters of their sire, (2) nested analysis of variance with LS fitted to a model including year-line and sire of litter, (3) weighted least-squares regression of average survival for the litter of daughters on the survival of the litter of their dam and (4) nested analysis of variance with LS fitted to a model including year-line and sire of dam of litter. Analyses were conducted with and without adjustment for litter size born. Estimates of the heritability of direct effects from methods 1 and 2 were negative. Adjustment to a common litter size born had no effect. If direct effects are considered to be negligible, as indicated by these analyses, then LS may be considered a trait of the dam. The heritability of maternal effects estimated from daughter-dam regression was .01 ± .02. The estimate of heritability of maternal effects obtained from analysis 4 was .07 ± .03. Again, there were no effects from adjustment to a common litter size born. These estimates were not significantly different and the pooled estimate was .03 ± .02. These analyses indicate that some additive genetic variance might exist for maternal effects but none for direct effects on LS. Selection for increased survival is not expected to be successful.

¹ Published as Paper No. 7297 of Journal Series, Nebraska Agr. Exp. Sta.

² Present address: Anim. Sci. Dept., Univ. of Missouri, Columbia 65211.

³ Dept. of Anim. Sci.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Su, M. S. Lund, and D. Sorensen Selection for litter size at day five to improve litter size at weaning and piglet survival rate J Anim Sci, June 1, 2007; 85(6): 1385 - 1392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Mesa, T. J. Safranski, K. M. Cammack, R. L. Weaber, and W. R. Lamberson Genetic and phenotypic relationships of farrowing and weaning survival to birth and placental weights in pigs J Anim Sci, January 1, 2006; 84(1): 32 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Mesa, T. J. Safranski, K. A. Fischer, K. M. Cammack, and W. R. Lamberson Selection for placental efficiency in swine: Genetic parameters and trends J Anim Sci, May 1, 2005; 83(5): 983 - 991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]