J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1984. 59:170-176.
© 1984 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coleman, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Dailey, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coleman, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Dailey, R. A.

Factors Affecting Ovarian Compensation after Unilateral Ovariectomy in Gilts1,2,

D. A. Coleman, M. W. Fleming3 and R. A. Dailey4

West Virginia University,5, Morgantown 26506-6108

4 Author to whom reprint requests should be made.

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to identify the temporal limits of an ovarian compensatory response after unilateral ovariectomy (ULO) in gilts and to examine ovarian and hormonal factors that might be related to this response. In the first study, all eight gilts that were unilaterally ovariectomized on d 12, 14 or 16 of an estrous cycle and two of four ULO on d 18 had a significant compensatory increase in ovulation rate per ovary compared with controls. Ovulatory compensation failed to occur, however, in two of four and four of four gilts ULO on d 18 or 19 of an estrous cycle, respectively. In the second study, blood samples were collected from 26 gilts beginning on d 14 of an estrous cycle, and animals were assigned to sham-surgery or ULO on d 17, 18 or 19. Ovarian compensation occurred after ULO on all 3 d of surgery in the second study, but most follicles failed to ovulate and formed large luteinized cysts. The ability to compensate was related positively to the number of medium-sized follicles on the intact ovary at the time of ULO, to an increase in concentrations of follicle-stimulating hormone 12 to 18 h after ULO and to the interval from ULO to the preovulatory surge of luteinizing hormone. In a third experiment, interruption of the ovulatory mechanism and development of cystic follicles similar to those observed in the second study were induced simply by physical manipulation of the d 19 preovulatory ovary while contralateral untouched ovaries ovulated normally.


Footnotes

1 Published as Paper No. 1784 in the Scientific Article Series of the West Virginia Agr. and For. Exp. Sta. Supported by West Virginia Senate Research Grants, Hatch Project 224 and National Research Service Award, Institutional NIADDKD AMO 7312.

2 We thank Dr. L. E. Reichert, Jr. for LH, Dr. G. D. Niswender for antisera to LH, Dr. R. J. Whitley for FSH and antisera to FSH and Dr. R. L. Butcher for antisera to estradiol and progesterone.

3 Present address: Animal Parasitology Institute, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, USDA, Beltsville, MD, 20705.

5 Division of Anim, and Vet. Sci., P.O. Box 6108.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American Society of Animal Science.